My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02655
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02655
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:25:04 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:02:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
409 Plan State Hazard Mitigation Plan Revision
Date
3/18/1998
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
Consultants
Floodplain - Doc Type
Community File
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-r ;' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />4. Does the state have a State Mitigation Teem? "yea. place the team creation <br />date in the convnent field. <br /> <br />5. 1$ the state Mitigation Plan c1eV8loped and or reviewed by . State Mltlgatlon <br />Team prior to being sent to FEMA. (208.402(0) (4)). <br /> <br />6. Is there an Executiw Order or IOme other legal insuument. which created and <br />provides authorization for the Mitigation T earn to implement mitigation actions <br />across a bro8d nmge of State programs? <br /> <br />7. Does the plan i'eference the State MitigatiOn Team and cite its euthorities and <br />responsibililies? <br /> <br />8. Has the state or local jurisdiction agreed to undertake any adion(s) as a <br />condition of past disaster assistance? If yell, KkIntify the ac;tion that lIV88 to be <br />taken and the current status (208.403 -) (3)). <br /> <br />9. Does the plan Identfy the hazards in the slate (206.405 (8) (1))? <br /> <br />10. If the answer to the abcMt question was no. does the plen identify the hazards in <br />the areas whfch have I1!C8Ived a Federal dectaratiOn for a major disaster. an <br />emergency or for fire IWppreuion? <br /> <br />11. Does the plan identify hazards by lISsoei'"'ing them with a geographic location, a <br />geologic feature, and a political Jurisdiction (I.e.. location on . USGS map p.llnel. <br />a mapped/named wallIl'lhed, In a narTllld c:ounty, town and/or community? <br /> <br />12. Is there an el/aluation of the potentiallNlgnllude of each hazard's characteristics <br />(storm surge, wave height. flood lewl, erosion, wind, Iquefaction) by geographic <br />location Off political jurisdiction. <br /> <br />13. Is any scale used to identify the likelihood of each haDrd-related event <br /> <br />14. Based upon the location, pdBntial n'I8llnitude, and lkeIihOOd of an event is there <br />an estimate af the nlImber of peaple at risk from each hazard? <br /> <br />15. Is there an estinl8le of the valUe oJ the property ~l!d to each hazard? <br /> <br />16. Are the critical fadIltilo'i that are expO$ed to each hazard identifJed? <br />17. B_d 00 the loc8tIon, poh..ltiaI magnitude. end likelihood of an event is there an <br />estimate of probable damage for each crilical facility? <br /> <br />18. Has the BIate identified potential enllironmentsl impacts a8SClCiatlld with specific <br />hazards for defined geographic areas or political jurisdictig~? <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.