My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02638
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02638
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:25:01 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:01:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Montrose
Community
Montrose
Stream Name
Uncompahgre River
Basin
Gunnison
Title
Montrose Flood Control and Drainage Plan
Date
3/1/1981
Prepared For
Montrose
Prepared By
Gingery Associates, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />construction in the downtown area, <br /> <br />Plan 4 - This plan is based on a :,,500 faat.-long open channel diver- <br />sion upstream of Niagra Street. A 6' x 56' trapezoidal channel would <br />divert 1,000 cfs from Montrose Arroyo to Dry Cedar' Creek just above <br />its confluence with the Uncompahgre River. This would drastica1'ly re- <br />duce the flood flows comi ng into the ci ty from ups tream, but because <br /> <br />of local drainage flows, seven road crossings would also have to be <br />replaced. The location of the proposed structures follow: <br /> South 9th Street 6' x 81 Bcx Culvert <br /> South 7th Street 6' x 18 ' Box Culvert <br /> South 6th Street 5.5' x 12' Box Culvert <br /> Sou th 5th Street S' x 8' Box Culvert <br /> South 4th Street 7' x 10' Box Culvert <br /> So uth 1st Street 9' x 9' Box Culvert <br /> No rth 7th Street ;3' x 8' Box Culvert <br /> <br />A bridge would also be requil'ed where the diversion channel crosses <br />Odell Street. This plan has a slightly lower cost, but severe dis- <br />advantages. A considerable amount of construction would be required, <br />some of it near downtown; but the greatest drawback is that there <br />would be no capacity to accept any increase i'1 local flows. <br /> <br />In June 1973, the Soil Conservation Service proposed a flood control <br />dam for the City of Montrose (Reference 9). This dam pl^ovides little <br />protection for Montrose because it is located so far upstream. It is <br /> <br />- 27 .- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.