My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02638
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02638
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:25:01 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:01:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Montrose
Community
Montrose
Stream Name
Uncompahgre River
Basin
Gunnison
Title
Montrose Flood Control and Drainage Plan
Date
3/1/1981
Prepared For
Montrose
Prepared By
Gingery Associates, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />South 12th Street 30' x 60' Bridge <br />South 9th Street ~ 35' x 60' Bridge <br />South 8th Street Improved Inlet <br />South 7th Street ~ 35' x 70' BI"i dge <br />South 6th Street - 30' x 60' BI"i dge <br />South 5th Street 8' x 15' Box Culvert <br />South 4th Street - 7' x 16' Box Culvert <br />South 1st Street 10' x 10' Box Culvert <br /> Main Street - 10' x 10' Box Culvert <br />North 7th Street 10' x 10' Box Culvert <br /> <br />These proposed structures would replace the exist-ing culverts and <br />fol1ow the existing alignment everY\1here, except for the Main Street <br />crossing. Because of the location of the Yellow Front Store, the new <br />box culvert would have to be constructed along the southwest side of <br />the building. <br /> <br />The proposed structures are all new; this plan avoids adding addi- <br />tional culverts to existing ones for two reasons. Because many of <br />the existing culverts are quite old, they would not last the 50-year <br />life of the project. This would requiy'e two construction projects - <br />one to add a second culvert;and another, some years later, to replace <br />the existing one. In addition, the proposed structures are less <br />susceptible to debris blockage because of their larger openings. <br /> <br />This plan provides excellent flood protection with the added benefit <br />of being able to contain up to a 100 percent increase in local urban <br />runoff. Additionally, this alternative can be constructed incrementally, <br />as the city can afford. Its disad'lantaqes are sl ightly higher cost and <br />- 26 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.