My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02593
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:24:53 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:00:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Basin
Statewide
Title
Water Project Development Financing Needs
Date
10/16/1986
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
311
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Potential Financing Opportunities <br />Apri 1 23, 1986 <br />Page two <br /> <br />One significant recent development in financing smaller projects is that <br />the CWCB authorizing legislation under 58 27 was amended to permit the CWCB to <br />fund up to 100 percent of a construction project at the discretion of the <br />Board, The interest rate on CWCB construction loans will be at the statutory <br />rate of five percent. This will greatly enhance their ability to finance pro- <br />jects - provided that the legislature agrees to appropriating funds for water <br />development. A key issue will be the question of the State providing large <br />subsidies for municipal raw water storage development. <br /> <br />Cost sharing for studies is generally between 0 to 50 percent of the cost <br />provided by the applicant, at the discretion of the CWC8 Board. The Board has <br />not required any cost sharing for some agricultural water supply developments. <br /> <br />The project with the best short-term prospect for the Authority is Auro- <br />ra's Senac Dam and pipeline system. I have had several discussions with Auro- <br />ra and highlighted to them how we could aid their financing activities as <br />fo 110ws: <br /> <br />. Authority does almost all of the paper work for bonding since we act as <br />the financing entity. <br /> <br />. The indebtedness would appear on their balance sheet as a long-term <br />loan instead of long-term bonds. This arrangement would have limited <br />impact on Aurora's bonding capacity. <br /> <br />. The Authority is not a competitor with municipalities for water devel- <br />opment. <br /> <br />. Authority would have administrative control of the financial aspects, <br />but the Authority would not own the project. The bonds would be <br />secured by an appropri ate contract. <br /> <br />. The State name on the bonds may result in lower effective interest rate <br />(5-20 basis points). <br /> <br />. Authority could pledge funds for a debt reserve fund which typically <br />amounts to principal and interest for one year (10-15 percent ~ of the <br />tota 1 bond float). <br /> <br />In brief, the Senac Water Storage Facility is described in the attached <br />sheet. The dam construction cost is about $30 million with auxiliary pipe- <br />1 ines and pumps adding about $15 mi 11 ion for a tot a 1 of $45 mi 11 ion. The <br />project is about a year from construction. <br /> <br />Aurora has about $50 million in unrestricted cash available for the <br />project, but they have numerous other needs where they can spend this money. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.