Laserfiche WebLink
<br />c. repair material and erosion protection material described <br />d. arrangements to share with government entities described <br /> <br />F. Review <br /> <br />1. Is there a comprehensive review of the plan at the time it is <br />developed? <br /> <br />a. technically accurate <br />b. workable <br />c. complies with criteria <br />d. comprehensive as a whole <br />e. presented effectively <br /> <br />II. Implementation of Plan <br /> <br />A. Local Coordination <br /> <br />1. Were emergency plans (including notification lists and inundation <br />maps) sent to all appropriate officials. Is a list maintained? <br /> <br />2. Have local officials had a briefing or other explanation of the <br />plan? Is a record maintained? <br /> <br />a. basic project data <br />b. maps explained <br />c. communication network explained <br />d. point of contacts exchanged <br />e. notification procedures clarified <br /> <br />3. Have effective lines of communication for crisis conditions been <br />set up? <br /> <br />4. Has agreement between dam owner and local officials been reached <br />in relationship to roles and responsibilities during a dam <br />crisis? Is it in writing? <br /> <br />5. Has the dam owner reviewed local evacuation plans and provided <br />feedback to local officials? <br /> <br />B. Testing <br /> <br />1. Has a plan for testing plans been developed? <br /> <br />2. Have tests been conducted? Is a schedule of tests maintained? <br /> <br />3. Have the following elements of the plan been tested? <br /> <br />a. problem identification <br />b. emergency scenarios <br />c. notification of dam owner and operating staff <br /> <br />24 <br />