Laserfiche WebLink
<br />g. civil disturbance <br />h. hazardous substance spills <br />i. sudden water releases <br />j. other potential disasters <br /> <br />3. Does the problem identification show all the possible locations <br />of the problem? <br /> <br />4. Are the above elements, indicators and events sufficiently <br />defined so that the user can understand them? <br /> <br />5. Does the plan identify the cause of the problem? <br /> <br />6. Can the user ascertain the seriousness of the problem? (i.e. <br />when the problem becomes an eKergency) <br /> <br />7. Can the user determine what action is needed? <br /> <br />8. Can the user ascertain exactly when to notify local officials and <br />which local officials to notify depending on the nature of the <br />problem? <br /> <br />9. Can the user determine what equipment or supplies are needed for <br />each type of problem? <br /> <br />10. Does the format of ' the plan easily link problem identification <br />with the action to take, notification to make, and equipment and <br />supplies to use? <br /> <br />11. Does the plan include a list of historical problems or a list of <br />most common problems for that type of dam? <br /> <br />C. Notification <br /> <br />1. Does the plan contain a list of key agency personnel which shows: <br /> <br />a. their office and 24 hr telephone number <br />b. their field of expertise <br />c. the name of their alternate <br />d. which officials to call first <br />e. their responsibilities <br /> <br />2. Does the plan show the dam tender or project manager's <br />responsibility in the event of a total loss of communications? <br /> <br />3. Does the plan's format allow the user to find the name of the <br />primary contacts quickly? Has the order of notification been <br />prioritized? <br /> <br />4. Does the plan's list of local officials in charge of evacuation <br />include: <br /> <br />22 <br />