Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />I <br />r <br /> <br />On October 4,1995, Hurricane Opal made landfall on Santa Rosa Island, Florida, near <br />Navarre Beach, at approximately 6:00 p.m. c.d. t. (central daylight time.) As a result of the damage <br />caused by Hurricane Opal, President Clinton declared 15 counties in the Florida Panhandle and <br />Lee County, on the southwest Florida coast, Federal disaster areas (see Figure 1-1). <br /> <br />The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) deployed a Building Performance <br />Assessment Team (BPAT) whose mission was to evaluate structural damage and recommend <br />mitigation measures that will enhance the performance of buildings in future storms. The team <br />was composed of engineers and building construction specialists from FEMA, the State of Florida, <br />and the private sector (see the Appendix for a list of the team members). The BPAT conducted its <br />evaluation in the area where most of the severe damage was concentrated: along a 200-mile <br />stretch of Florida's Gulf of Mexico shoreline, between Pensacola Beach, in Escambia County, and <br />St.Joseph Spit, in Gulf County (see Figure 1-1). The BPAT's observations focused on the <br />performance of buildings during the hurricane, including both successes and failures. These <br />observations and the BPAT's recommendations are documented in this report. <br /> <br />Preliminary estimates by the insurance industry indicate that Opal may be one of the most <br />costly natural disasters to affect the United States (ranking only behind Hurricane Andrew; the <br />Northridge, California, earthquake; and Hurricane Hugo). According to State of Florida <br />estimates, more structures were damaged or destroyed by the effects of flooding and erosion <br />during Hurricane Opal than in all other coastal storms affecting Florida in the past 20 years <br />combined. <br /> <br />, <br />, <br />" <br /> <br />Most of the structural damage associated with the storm appeared to have been caused by <br />coastal flood forces - storm surge, wind-generated waves, flood-induced erosion, and floodborne <br />debris. Wind damage along the coast was confined primarily to roof damage, sign damage, tree <br />damage, and similar impacts and was judged by the BPAT to be less severe and less extensive than <br />flood damage. <br /> <br />Construction along and near the shoreline in the study area was generally governed by one <br />or more of the follo,,~ng: <br /> <br />. The Standard Building Code, enforced by local or county governments <br /> <br />. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) construction requirements - in identified <br />Special Flood Hazard Areas - enforced by local or county governments <br /> <br />. State construction requirements for structures seaward of the Coastal Construction Control <br />Line, enforced by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection <br /> <br />To participate in the NFIP, a community must adopt and enforce a floodplain management <br />ordinance based on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (TIRM) issued for the community by FEMA. <br />The communities in the study area include structures built before the adoption of the floodplain <br />management ordinance and structures built after the adoption of the ordinance. The former are <br />referred to as "pre-FIRM" structures, the later as "post-TIRM." Typical pre-TIRM structures in the <br />study area are one-story concrete block or wood-frame structures built on slab-on-grade <br /> <br />HURRICANE OPAL IN FLORIDA <br /> <br />1 <br />