Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Figure 2. Loss of pro- <br />tective vegetation due <br />to fire; Laguna Beach, <br />CA., November 1993 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />mary mechanism for soil erosion. Vegetation <br />also increases the infiltr.uion of water into the <br />soil. reduces runoff velocities. filters out sedi- <br />ment, and provides plant roots to hold the soil <br />together (Figure 3). Without vegetation and its <br />benefiu, sediment production and runoff in <br />fire-affected areas and more important, its de- <br />livery down slope: increases. <br />Burned watcrsheds erode in differem ways. <br />depending on soil type, climate, vegetation. bur- <br />rowing and grazing animals. mpography and <br />human activicy. Dry creep. or dry ravel, is the <br />downhill movement of soil and debris during <br />dry periods, and is caused by gravitational forces. <br />Where fire burns the vegetative cover, the: me- <br />chanical resistance [0 gravitadonal forces decreas- <br />es, and the soils become more susceptible to this <br />eype of erosion. Dry ravc:1 is a major erosional <br />force in post-fire condidons. Soil and debris ac. <br />cumulates at the base of slopes and remains <br />stored until mobilized by intense runoff. This is <br />known as channc:lloading. Intense runoff often <br />occurs after a fire and can be the result of the de- <br />velopment of soil hydrophobicity. <br />Hydrophobic. or water-repellent soils can de~ <br />vc:lop from substances in the soil which are va- <br />poril.ed during the burning of surface litter. <br />particularly on sandy soils. Hydrophobic soils <br />are created as the fire breaks down organic mat- <br />ter and chemicals in the soils, releasing a gas <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />fire haurd assessment and mitigation planning <br />conducted by Woodward-Clyde Consultants <br />(WCe) for the California Office of Emergency <br />Services (OES) and its implementation in the <br />communities of Malibu, Thousand Oaks, la- <br />guna Beach, and Orange County. <br /> <br />The post-fire hazard <br /> <br />Considerable information is available on <br />post-fire sediment production rates and debris <br />flows in California, particularly in Southern <br />California, including studies by Wells <br />(1981.1985.1987), the Handbook of Appli.d <br />Hydrology by Yen Te Chow, and the [0, Ang"-' <br />County Hydrology Manual These studies show <br />that fire accc:lerates erosion rates in California <br />chaparral to such an extent that it must be con- <br />sidered the major factor which drives sediment <br />production on these lands. The surface process- <br />es of dry ravc:l and rill network formation are <br />major contributors to this accc:lerated erosion, <br />and debris flows are a common occurrence. <br />These flows move most of the sediment pro- <br />duced after a fire, and can occur following very <br />little rainfall. <br />The incidence of fire temporarily reduces the <br />beneficial effects mat plants provide in reducing <br />soil erosion (Figure 2). Planes provide cover that <br />intercepts and reduces rainfall impact, the pri- <br /> <br />Table 1. Summary of fire damage <br /> <br />Oakland-East Bay Southern California <br />Flrestorm Fires <br /> <br />:. .:. IJ <br />~r"". ,.. 11:""'. I~' . . '";. .....~ 11'J":.: ~ .'. ,......,~ '..,.,..\ <br />. , ~ri':i!i1l1':"l-111;i"li .I&t;: ' ;!liJI'l:';::. "'~ [!',J. ~'.. <br />'1..!:., I ,.1l.."'J!!" '~]I .:1 .1 rj '..~\.!'l~. . <br /> <br />536 JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATE.R. CONSERVATION <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />~b <br />