My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02242
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02242
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:23:52 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:43:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Gunnison
Community
Uncompahgre Valley
Basin
Gunnison
Title
Uncompahgre Valley Reclamation Project - Hydropower - Part 1 - Final Environmental Impact Statement
Date
8/28/1990
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1,1 <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />Summary Table S-l.--Short- and long-term impacts <br />resulting from alternatlves--AB Lateral Project <br /> <br />Resource <br /> <br />Irre- <br />versible <br />impact' <br /> <br />Irre- <br />trievable <br />impact! <br /> <br />Relationship of short-term <br />use of environmental and <br />long-term productivity <br /> <br />streamflows <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />Irrigation <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />River mechanics <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />Water temperature <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />Water quality <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />Streamflows in the Gunnison River would <br />be reduced by diversions to proposed <br />development. Streamflows in the <br />Uncompahgre River would be increased. <br />Larqest decreases and increases would <br />occur durinq the winter months.. <br /> <br />Water supplies to irrigated lands would <br />not be affected. Development would be <br />operated to provide required demands to <br />irrigation system before meeting <br />hydropower demands. <br /> <br />Without mitigation, development <br />would increase bank erosion along the <br />Uncompahgre River downstream from the <br />proposed tailrace. However, mitigation <br />would help control the erosion. <br />Gunnison River channel impacts would be <br />less than would occur in the Cncompahqre <br />River; however, changes presented in <br />this FEIS to the Uncompahgre would be <br />considered irreversible. <br /> <br />periodic ice accumulation would <br />occur during severely cold periods. <br />Durinq summer months, water t~mperatures <br />in the Gunnison River below the North <br />Fork confluence would increase during <br />low flow periods. Temperatures in the <br />Uncompahgre River would decrease in the <br />summer below the powerplant and <br />increase in the summer through the city <br />of Montrose. <br /> <br />Water quality in the Uncompahgre River <br />would improve below the proposed <br />tailrace. Water quality would degrade <br />in the Uncompahgre River between the <br />South Canal and the tailrace. Water <br />quality in the Gunnison River would <br />degrade downstream of the Smith Fork <br />confluence. <br /> <br />1 An irreversible impact to a resource is one that cannot be changed once it <br />occurs. <br />2 An irretrievable impact means that the resource cannot be recovered or reused. <br /> <br />s - 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.