Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i <br />I <br /> <br />i ,- <br /> <br />"'....."i.~.~ .t<~.... ". . ..~..... -. "" "r <br /> <br />The U.S.G.S. Bench Mark "E 357" was used by one survey <br />crew as the datum for a level circuit that established a <br />temporary bench mark (TBM) on the headwall of a concrete <br />box culvert for Boxelder Creek under Prospect Street. A <br />brass cap bench mark (#25) set for Larimer County using <br />U.S.G.S. datum for control of development adjacent to the <br />Cache La Poudre River Floodplain was used by a different <br />survey crew as the datum for a second level circuit to <br />check the elevation of the TBM on the box culvert under <br />Prospect Street. The independent surveys, both in excess <br />of 1.5 miles in length, established the TBM elevation within <br />0.05 feet of each other. The elevation of 4900.15 feet <br />above mean sea level established by the level circuit from <br />the U.S.G.S. BM "E 357" was used in all topographic infor- <br />mation gathered for Prospect Meadows and for this investi- <br />gation of Boxelder Creek. The topographic information <br />gathered included a grid-type pattern of elevations for all <br />of Prospect Meadows; cross-sections at key locations through- <br />out the reach of Boxelder Creek; and detailed information on <br />Prospect Street, the concrete box culvert under Prospect <br />Street and the flume-type crossing of the Cache La poudre <br />Reservoir Inlet Canal over Boxelder Creek. <br />The U.S. Corps of Engineers' H.E.C. 2 computer program <br />"Water Surface Profiles" was used to make the hydraulic <br />investigations. Manning's Coefficients, "n" values, of <br />0.05 for overbank flow and 0.03 for channel flow,were used <br />to be conservative in the analysis (the majority of over- <br />bank flow is over short grass and weed cover with little <br />variation in the shape or direction of the floodplain in <br />this reach). The obstruction of Prospect Street with the <br />undersized culvert for Boxelder Creek was investigated <br />using the "normal bridge routine" option of the H.E.C. 2 <br />program, while the canal flume with pier supports over <br /> <br />) <br />} <br />