Laserfiche WebLink
<br />heights) could be calculated for any arbitrary water level, but no monthly <br />values could yet be asaigned since there were no monthly stage data. <br />However, current velocities could be estimated through the entire range of <br />water level, the longitudinal slope could be measured, and Manning's n <br />could be readily calculated. With this value, current velocities for all <br />water levels could be computed. Then a regression line was calculated which <br />related current velocity to the cross-sectional area of that portion of the <br />channel occupied by water, with the velocity/area relation calculated for <br />each of many small increments of water level change (fig. 2). The slope and <br />intercept of the regression line are then characteristic of the type of <br />channel and water regime at that site. Now, turning again to the literature <br />sites, the same process was used to obtain regression lines which charac- <br />terize those si tes. <br /> <br />17. In topographically and climatically similar regions, streams of <br />equivalent size (or discharge) will exhibit similar channel geometries if <br />their discharge regimes are similar. By extension, streams which exhibit <br />similar water level/discharge (or water level/current velocity) relations <br />will exhibit similar discharge (or stage) regimes. The procedure was then <br />to match the slope and intercept values of the velocity/area regression line <br />of each field site with its closest equivalent among the velocityfarea re- <br />gression lines of the literature sites; when a close fit was found, the stage <br />regime of the literature site was assigned to the related field site. With <br />stage relations thus assigned, the various factors describing the field sites <br />could be readily calculated for each month. Thus, all geometric and hydro- <br />logic factors could be completed for both field and literature sites <br />(fig. 3). <br /> <br />18. The digits in the "Stage" columns in the part of fig. 3 labelled <br />"Factor Complex" are arranged in the following left-to-right sequence: <br />Depth, water width, left bank height, right bank height, left bank angle, <br />right bank angle, velocity. The numerical value of the digits correspond <br />to the class of the respective factor in Table 2. For example, the number <br />3 in the upper left corner means the water depth for the mean high stage <br />conditions for 15 January in water depth class 3, i.e. > 100-200 em. <br /> <br />19. The soil strength (cone index value) and vegetation factors were, <br />as previously mentioned, completely absent from the literature site descrip- <br />tions and were, of course, available for the field sites only at the time <br />the site was visited by the field team. Since vegetation structure is not <br />time-dependent (at least on the scale of time considered for this work) the <br />factor values for all sites remained a constant throughout the year. Factor <br />descriptions were obtained directly from field data for the field sites, <br />while photo interpretation techniques were used to provide these data for <br />the literature sites. <br /> <br />18 <br />