My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02234
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02234
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:23:50 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:42:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Hydrologic Aspects of Project Planning
Date
3/7/1972
Prepared For
US
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />12. To fill in the gaps, field measurements were made at various <br />sites in the study area. The sites were selected on the basis of prelimi- <br />nary air photo interpretation of the study area. Two fundamental criteria <br />were used: first, they represented what appeared to be commonly recurring <br />gap types; and second, they represented points or places in which no inter- <br />pretation could be made because the combinations of features were unfamiliar <br />to the interpreters. <br /> <br />13. The field data collection was designed to acquire the maximum <br />possible amount of basic data so that they would be as widely useful as <br />possible. For example, bed and bank configurations were recorded as a <br />vertical profile across the gap. From such data the various geometric <br />factors (such as gap width, bank angles, bank heights) can be readily <br />calculated. <br /> <br />Gap conditions as a function of time <br /> <br />14. A condition of the project was that the final description be such <br />that the gap conditions for any time of the year could be defined. To <br />achieve this, a method was developed and us,,;] for "pr"dicting" the condition <br />of every gap throughout a yearly cycle. <br /> <br />15. The literature data (i.e. the stream hydrograph data) commonly <br />included stage and discharge data, usually in such form that mean stage <br />and its correlative discharge by month could be readily obtained. With <br />these data, combined with a gap cross section, it was possible to compute <br />all of the pertinent geometric factors (water depth, water width, gap width, <br />bank angles, and bank heights) for any water level. Some, but not all, of <br />the literature sites also included current velocity data. In those instances <br />where such data were available, the current velocity for any water level could <br />also be computed. In those instances where current velocity data were not <br />included, it was necessary to calculate the velocities by indirect methods. <br />This was done by using the "Manning equation," with the required longitudinal <br />slope value ob tained from topographic maps. "Manning's n," the "roughness <br />number," was obtained by photo interpretation. The solution of the Manning <br />equation provides a mean velocity value which can then be adjusted to give <br />maximum velocity. Thus, at this point, all literature sites were represented <br />by complete hydrologic and geometric data (bank angles, bank heights, gap <br />width, water width, water depth, and maximum current velocities) for any <br />month or for any arbitrary water level. <br /> <br />16. The field data (i.e. that collected by the field team), of course, <br />recorded only one point in time, and thus no stage or water level data were <br />available except for the day on which the gap was measured. For these sites, <br />geometric data (gap width, water width, water depth, bank angles, bank <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.