Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />IV HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />between the floodway and the flood fringe is made in Reference <br /> <br /> <br />l. The floodway is the general flood channel which could convey <br /> <br /> <br />the entire lOO-year flow with a water surface not exceeding that <br /> <br /> <br />of the normal lOO-year flood by more than 0.5 feet. Conversely, <br /> <br /> <br />the flood fringe is that portion of the flood plain which could <br /> <br /> <br />be blocked or filled with earth without causing an increase in <br /> <br /> <br />water surface or more than 0.5 feet. This distinction between <br /> <br /> <br />floodway and flood fringe essentially divides the flood plain <br /> <br /> <br />into an area which carries a major portion of the flow, and an <br /> <br /> <br />area which is relatively ineffective in terms of conveying the <br /> <br /> <br />flood. The flood fringe would be flooded by relatively slow <br /> <br /> <br />moving water. <br /> <br />Hydraulic computations were made along the channels of Dry and <br /> <br /> <br />North Dry Gulches to determine the extent of flooding which would <br /> <br /> <br />occur in the four predicted floods. The principal tool used in <br /> <br /> <br />the hydraulic analysis was the computer program developed by the <br /> <br /> <br />U.S. Army Corps of Engineers entitled "HEC 2, Water Surface Pro- <br /> <br /> <br />files" (Reference 4). Data relating to channel slope, roughness, <br /> <br /> <br />cross section shape, and existing drainage facilities were <br /> <br /> <br />developed from the topographic maps, facilities plans, and field <br /> <br /> <br />reconnaissance. These data were then utilized by the computer <br /> <br /> <br />program to calculate flow depths, widths and velocities at <br /> <br /> <br />selected cross sections along each channel. <br /> <br />The water surface elevations in each storm were determined at <br /> <br /> <br />each cross section, and the topographic maps were used to inter- <br /> <br /> <br />polate flooded outlines between cross sections. The development <br /> <br /> <br />of these flooded area maps made it possible to estimate which <br /> <br /> <br />properties and structures would be expected to be inundated in <br /> <br /> <br />the five-, ten-, fifty-, and one hundred-year floods. <br /> <br />After the proposed facilities for the Master Plan were selected, <br /> <br /> <br />flooded outlines were prepared for the lOa-year flooding which <br /> <br /> <br />would occur after construction of the facilities. This "resi- <br /> <br /> <br />dual" lOO-year flood plain limit is illustrated on each of the <br /> <br /> <br />Major Drainageway Planning Sheets of Section VII. <br /> <br />The anticipated extent of flooding in a lOO-year flood is illus- <br /> <br /> <br />trated in detail in "Flood Hazard Area Delineation, Dry Gulch <br /> <br /> <br />and Tributaries" (Reference l), and on the Major Drainageway <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Sheets of Section VII of this report. A delineation <br />