Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />TABLE III-l <br /> <br />Five-Year <br />Ten-Year <br />Fifty-Year <br />One Hundred-Year <br /> <br />l.69 inches <br />2.08 inches <br />2.6l inches <br />2.92 inches <br /> <br />Flow rates at various points along Dry Gulch and North Dry Gulch <br /> <br /> <br />were determined presuming that the channels would remain in their <br /> <br /> <br />present conditions. A hydraulic analysis was then performed to <br /> <br /> <br />determine the levels of flooding in each of the four storms. <br /> <br /> <br />This analysis indicated that flows on both major channels diverge <br /> <br /> <br />at several locations and enter different basins or follow separate <br /> <br /> <br />courses. For this reason, the hydrology of the basin was closely <br /> <br /> <br />interrelated with the basin hydraulics. On several instances, <br /> <br /> <br />the hydraulic analysis indicated that a flow split occurred, thus <br /> <br /> <br />changing the flow rates downstream. The hydraulic analysis with <br /> <br /> <br />the adjusted flows sometimes indicated a need for a further re- <br /> <br /> <br />finement of the flow rates. The results of this iterative pro- <br /> <br /> <br />cedure were compiled into a figure of peak flow rates in each <br /> <br /> <br />flood at all stations along the two gulches. These flow rates <br /> <br /> <br />for existing channel conditions (Before Construction of Recom- <br /> <br /> <br />mended Facilities) are presented in Figures III-l and 1II-2. <br /> <br />TOTAL RAINFALL IN STORMS OF 200 MINUTE DURATION ON DRY GULCH <br /> <br />Return Period <br /> <br />Rainfall <br /> <br />Computation of Runoff for Existing Channel Conditions <br /> <br /> <br />Information was acquired from the cities of Lakewood and Denver <br /> <br /> <br />which forecast land use within the basin at future dates. The <br /> <br /> <br />information was presumed to represent "fully developed" land use. <br /> <br /> <br />Parameters such as infiltration rate, depression storage, deten- <br /> <br /> <br />tion storage, and percentage of impervious ground cover were <br /> <br /> <br />,utilized to determine the amount of "effective rainfall" which <br /> <br /> <br />would be discharged from each sub-basin. Parameters such as <br /> <br /> <br />tributary area, channel length, distance to basin centroid, and <br /> <br /> <br />several coefficients were selected and used to compute the hydro- <br /> <br /> <br />graphs of runoff which would be formed as the result of the effec- <br /> <br /> <br />tive precipitation on each sub-basin. The hydrograph flows were <br /> <br /> <br />then combined in order to develop flood flows along each channel. <br /> <br />Computation of Runoff after Implementation of the Proposed <br /> <br /> <br />Master Plan <br /> <br /> <br />As previously stated, the flows which would presently occur in <br /> <br /> <br />major storms are significantly affected by detention ponding, <br /> <br /> <br />flow splitting, and inadvertent trans-basin diversions. <br />