Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />I! <br /> <br />(3) Peak 30-minute rainfall = 0.70 X (Peak 60-min rain) <br /> <br />(4) Peak 15-minute rainfall = 0.60 X (Peak 30-min rain) <br /> <br />where the Precipitable Water Index (PWI) is a measure of the amount of water in the atmosphere <br />from the surface to about 20,000 feet above the ground. A matrix of rainfall rates, which are <br />derived from surface temperature and dew point fields are used to initialize the 2-D model output. <br />For each set of surface temperature-dew point combinations, a unique radar-rainfall relationship is <br />created for precipitation mapping, In effect the peak 60, 30, and 15-minute rainfall rates are <br />related to the 50 dBZ or greater radar reflectivity values within the precipitating cloud. Lower <br />rainfall rates are down,stepped to correspond with lower radar reflectivity values. <br /> <br />2.1 Event specific radar-rainfall estimate methodology <br /> <br />A nearby ALERT weather station's temperature/dew point values were used to initialize the HDR <br />2-D cloud model for rainfall estimation, For the event of July 30th, 1998 the Blue Mountain ALERT <br />weather station, owned and operated by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, was used <br />in the model initialization process. <br /> <br />An example of this relationship and the calculations for the afternoon of July 30, 1998 will now be <br />discussed to illustrate the points just made. The temperature and dew point information were <br />plotted on a Skew-T, Log P diagram, containing information derived from a radisonde, launched at <br />Denver, Colorado around 500AM MDT, to calculate the PWL The calculated PWI was 1.28" <br />adjusted for an elevation of 8,500 feet above sea level, while the depth of the warm updraft layer <br />was 2.3 KM. The next step entailed solving equation (2) to calculate peak 60-minute rainfall rate. <br /> <br />Values for PWI and the depth of the warm layer were inserted into equation (2), and the result <br />was inserted into equation (3), resulting in a peak 30-minute rainfall rate of 2.74 inches, This <br />rainfall rate was divided by 5, which corresponded to a 6-minute peak rainfall of 0.55". The peak <br />6-minute rainfall values were assigned to the grid squares covered by radar reflectivity values of <br />50 dBz or greater. Lower rainfall rates were assigned to grid squares associated with lower <br />reflectivity values and are shown in Table 1, The peak 30-min rainfall rate was used, based on <br />the fact that the duration of the heaviest rainfall was around 30 minutes, <br /> <br />0.09" <br />0.13" <br />0.19" <br />0.27" <br />0.38" <br />,,50.0.. 0.55" <br />Table 1 Relationship between peak 6-minute rainfall rates and radar reflectivity values, <br /> <br /> <br />The radar reflectivity data field was navigated to their corresponding grid square and assigned a <br />reflectivity value of 0 through 11. Table 2 shows the reflectivity values and their associated dBz <br />values, The resolution of the radar reflectivity data allows it to define the radar reflectivity for 0,60 <br />by 0.60 square mile area, Figures 1 and 2 show the HDR <br /> <br />3 <br />