Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1-2 <br /> <br />TABLE I-I <br /> <br />o To increase the channel capacity, approximately 1,300 1 inear feet of <br />the existing concrete channel walls should be raised to provide 1 foot <br />of freeboard above the 100-year flood water surface. Provisions should <br />be made for adequate drainage of the areas behind these flood walls for <br />both local drainage and a possible severe event in which the walls may <br />be overtopped. <br /> <br /> COST SUMMARY <br />FOR IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIEIJ IN PHASE B REPORT WITHIN EACH JURISDICTION <br /> JEFFERSON <br />ITEM CITY OF GOLDEN * COUNTY <br />CONSTRUCTI ON <br />Channel Improvement Costs $ 669,700 :Ii 55,000 $ 302,000 <br />Floodproofing Costs ($ 115,000) <br />Channel Crossing Costs $ 710,000 $ 280,000 <br /> ($ 30,000) <br />WTP & Maple St. Berm Costs ($ 160,000) <br />Utility Relocation Costs $ 95,000 $ 10,000 $ 20,000 <br />Flood Emergency Plan ($ 25,000) <br />Subtotal Construction Costs $1,474,700 $ 345,000 $ 322,000 <br /> ($ 330,000) <br />Engineering and Con- <br />tingencies (30% of $ 442,400 $ 103,500 $ 96,600 <br />(Construction Costs) ($ 99,000) <br />Fiscal, Legal and Admin- <br />istrative (10% of $ 191,700 $ 44,900 $ 41,900 <br />Above Total) ($ 42,900) <br />Property Acquisition Costs $1,514,000 <br />Total Improvement Costs $3,622,800 $ 493.350 $ 460,500 <br /> ($ 471,900) <br />MAINTENANCE <br />Annual Operation/ :Ii 25,950 $ 12,000 $ 73,700 <br />Maintenance Cost <br /> <br />o A flow restrictor should be installed at the entrance structure for the <br />Farmers Hi ghl ine Canal conduit to 1 imit surcharge of the conduit and <br />overtopping of the canal channel downstream. <br /> <br />o Downstream from the brewery area, the south channel bank adjacent to <br />the Coors container facilities should be raised approximately 1 foot to <br />prevent overflow by the 100-year flood. <br /> <br />Due to the proprietary nature of the Adolph Coors Industries processes, the <br />details of the analyses at the Coors Complex is not to be disclosed at their <br />request. The engineering staff at Adolph Coors Industries will weigh the <br />benefits and costs of the various flood mitigation measures to determine the <br />course of action which best suits their needs and goals. In the interim, <br />the consultant recommends the establishment of a Flood Emergency Plan under <br />which critical facilities would be protected and equipment mobilized for <br />debris control. etc. <br /> <br />Reach 3 (McIntyre Street to Youngfield Street) <br />Removal and relocation of a drop structure is recommended at the Coors <br />Commod ities Transload bridge Just downstream of Mc Intyre Street to prevent <br />overflows. Construction of a drop structure is recommended at the Denver <br />Water Department conduit crossing to protect the pipel ines from washout. <br />Floodplain regulation is recommended for the remainder of Reach 3, <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Co sts in parentheses in the 1 eft column represent costs for the inter im <br />plan of improvements for Reach 1 described in detail in the commentaries <br />for plan and profile sheets 1 and 2. Costs indicated in the right column <br />are improvement costs within the Coors Industries area, Reach 2, Station <br />850+00 to Station 885+00. Costs within Jefferson County include improve- <br />ments at the Coors Container Building area (Station 822+00 to Station <br />829+00) and at the Coors Commodities Transload area (Station 735+00). <br />