Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />B-1 <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br />The design criteria utilized for this master plan are based on those con- <br />tained in the Denver Regional Council of Governments' Urban Storm Drainage <br />Criteria Manual (Reference 32). rlowever, due to the steep gradient, 1 arge <br />size bed material, and the bridge structures at Ford Street and Washington <br />Avenue, exceptions have been made with regard to allowable overbank depth <br />and average velocity. Specific planning and design criteria applicable to <br />Clear Creek - Youngfield through Golden are the following: <br /> <br />1. GRASS-LINED CHANNELS. Design will generally be based on channels having <br />natural waterway hytlraul ic and appearance characteristics. They should <br />be aesthetically designed toi;he local environment and should provide <br />multi purpose benefits such as recreational uses where appl icable. <br />Specific criteria include: <br /> <br />APPENDIX B <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED STRUCTURAL CRITERIA FOR CLEAR CREEK - <br />YOUNGFIELD THROUGH GOLDEN <br /> <br />o 100-year design overbank depths would be approximately 10 feet in the <br />vicinity of Ford Street and Washington Avenue, and \\Ould average be- <br />t\\een 5 and 7 feet upstream to U. S. 6. <br /> <br />o A max imlJ11 aver age des i gn velocity of 8.0 to 12.0 feet per second <br />(fps) for the lOO-year storm. Riprap protection would be required at <br />critical areas such as the toe of slopes. <br /> <br />o 4:1 channel side slopes, however, where develor:ment exists and right- <br />of-way is a problem, the slopes may be 3:1. A 2: 1 slope must be sta- <br />bil ized by riprap protection. <br /> <br />o Freeboard no 1 ess than 1. 0 foot. <br /> <br />o Grass cover chosen for hytlraul ic retardance, i.e., resistance to <br />scour forces, and ease of maintenance. <br /> <br />o The low flow channel would be sized to carry the average spring snow- <br />melt flow, or approximately 800 cfs. The existing channel width, <br />averaging between 60 and 65 feet, generally affords this capacity at <br />a depth of about 2 feet. <br />