Laserfiche WebLink
<br />probability adjuat~ents to raInfall were made for length of record. The <br />time dIstrIbution of rainfall wIthin the I-hour stor~ was developed frn~ <br />lllJAAerIteria. InftltratIon ratcs were obtained fr0lll3WeldCountySoll <br />Mnp and Soil ResQurces of Color~do, Region 2-Larimer and Weld Counties, <br />published by the Colorsdo State Urdvcrsity Experiment Station and the <br />SCStn1976. A value of 0.2:1nchwas"sed for deleotion atorage. <br /> <br />sections were placed at cloae intervals upstream and downstream fro~ <br />bridges and culvcrra in order tocOlllpute the significant backwater <br />effects of the,. ,,__,,",... "" , <br />.u r uge cro"" aect ons Were fleld surveyed <br />to determlne elevation data and structure geo~try. The locations of <br />the Cross sectiona are shown on the flooded area maps. Plate 4 ia an <br />index which ahowa the location of the floodcd area mapa, plates) <br />through 16. The cross sectio~ locations are also designated on the <br />flood profiles, which are platea 17 through 28. <br /> <br />The effect of future urb3nhation, edating s_ll dams, road struc- <br />tures, and irrigation canala was consider~d. It was assumed that <br />irrielltion canals do not provide dependable flood control. Si~ilarly, <br />lIince the sma.ll dallla which exiat in the baainseeve irrigation, the <br />assumption waS made by local intereata that these dama would not rema.in <br />if the ar..a were urbanbed. Roadwaya that cross the Sheep Draw valley <br />are relatively high and sct to retard floodflows. Secause of these <br />factors and assumptions, the decision was ~de at the local level to <br />e~lude the effect of the irrigation 'anals and tha small irrigation <br />da~s fr~ this atudy under both existing and urbanized conditions but <br />to include the effect of the roadways. <br /> <br />The t.y<lrau':'~c ""a1fsls w."b cc,nJucted <:>n Gheep 0.."" tu ':eU't'"~"" <br /> <br />Manning'a"n"vsluell...creestImatedbyf1eldinapectiontobe <br />0.035 to 0.040 for the channel and 0.040 - 0.100 for the overbank, <br />Scartiqs ...nter aurface eIevationa at the mouth of Sheep Draw were baaed <br />on Sheep Drsw flooding with a coinCident base flow of 1,100 cubic feet <br />per second (c.f.s.) in the Cache Ia Poudre River. The water surface <br />elevation of the Cache la Poudre River OlliS determined by analyzing <br />stage-discharge relationahips for the CaChe la Poudre River from Flood <br />Plain Information, Cache la Poudre River, Colorado, Volume II, Greeley. <br />Weld County, publhhed hy theOmahs DtanictCorpa of Engineers in <br />March 1974. Water aurtace elevatIons on Sheep Dcaw were computed by <br />the Corps of Eogineers' atnndard ~tep batkwater computer progr~, <br />HEC-2. Tl tf <br />'e ~ . ect of brid~es, culverts, snd r08dwsys upon Sheep Draw <br />n<,od W;1ter sllcf:lcQ ~lev..ti,,"~ ~,'" d"te.rmined by using bridge analysfa <br />techniques contained in the llEC-2 computer program and a publication <br />entitl..d HYdraulica of BridKeWaterways, publiShed by tho U.S. <br />D"part!llentofTransportationinI970. Flood reconatituttonwas not <br />conducted becauae of a lack of flOOd hiatoty. <br /> <br />HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />the water surface elevation of the 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year floods. <br />TopoKraphic mapping conaisted of orthophoto mapa at a scale of 1,2400 <br />and a contour interval of 2 feet and uses ] .~-l1inute Quadrangle lII8pping <br />haviOR n scale of 1:24,000 and a contour interval of 10 feet. The <br />.>rthophoto "",pping waa prep,..ed for Weld C(lU~ty, Colorado. snd the (;WCB <br /> <br />by 11&1 Consulting Engineers of <br />was taken on 20 December 1977. <br /> <br />Fort Collins, Colorado. The photography <br />The mapping was prepared :In Dece~bec <br /> <br />"' <br /> <br />All flood elevations are baged upon open <br />debrla or ice. The flood elevationa ahewn <br /> <br />channel conditions free <br /> <br />1978. A total of 136 crosa sections were taken hy photogremmetrie <br /> <br />are, therefore, COn- <br />sidered valid only it hydraulic structurea, in genecal, remain <br />unobstructed. Since '0''''' ob"--,,,," , " <br />.u S CO"".on uUrillg floods, flood <br />As discuna"d in the hydrologic <br />analysis, th~ fluud dhcha'g,'a fur both edatfng and urbsnlzed <br /> <br />;nethods. The streambcd elevatIon deriv~d from the cro"s sectIons i. <br />8etually the low-w8ur profile. II""'ever, str..".. floww"s minll.al at <br />the t t,." tlw ph<Hog.aphy fur the 10.81'1'1"8 "'as ta~<'n. Slrealll ~ro~s <br /> <br />conditions could h~ worss than shown. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />" <br />