Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 1 <br />FerceDt of Imperviouaness for Land Uaes <br />in the Sheep Draw Basin <br /> <br />fLOOD PROBLEMS <br /> <br />Lsnd !Jse <br /> <br />Impervious Area <br />(percenr) <br /> <br />Flood history is not readily available for Sheep Draw as the basin <br />hnsbeenajMrselydeveloped. Floodexpedenceinthearealndlcatea <br />that snowmelt flooding is uncommon and that Summer cloudbursta would be <br />the most likely sourCe of flooding. Flood damages are also possible in <br />the event of large amounts of runoff from tribotariea or small dralnage- <br />ways flowing into Sheep Draw. There are no flood control works 1n the <br />bssin. Small irrigation dams, irrigattoncanals, and roadcroaaing <br />structures provide some incIdental flood discharge reduction, as <br />discussed in the hydrologic analyais. <br /> <br />CCII.u'.ercts.l <br />Medium Density Residential <br />Agricultural <br /> <br />" <br />" <br />, <br /> <br />The land use patterns were slightly altered to fit hydrologic sub- <br />areas in the hydrologic model. To depict urban land use 8S actually <br />used in the hydrologic model, areas with approximately 40 psrcent Or <br />more imperviousuess are indicated on plate 3. Any changes in these <br />lsnd use projections and future urbanlsation boundaries would change <br />the hydrologic and hydraulic data presented in this study. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE LAND USE CONDITIONS <br /> <br />The Sheep Drsw flood hazard was evaluated under future as well as <br />existing conditions since the Sheep Draw basin is subject to increasing <br />urban develop~nt. Changes in Imperviousness that would result from <br />land use chs.nges will affect the runoff potential. To reflect the <br />influence of changing development, three levela of urbanization were <br />considered. Bxisting and future urbanization are shown on plate 3. <br />Two of these urbaolsation levels, existing and projected, are ahown in <br />the report entitled Larimer-~eld Region Land Use Alternatives prepared <br />for the Larimer-Weld Regional Council of Govern~pnts in November 1977. <br />The existing urbanisation reflects no significant urban development. <br />Projected urbanization Is based upon year 2000 land use. ThIs level of <br />urbanization repreaents an intermediate level of development in that <br />11,,, <l""~Llbtr"."s I,..H or the Sh""p Dr..... n..~lLl b ur"""h"d. Tutal <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />A hydrologic analysis was carried out to establish the peak dla- <br />charges for flood. of variou5 frequencie.. Ploods with lO-, 50-, 100-, <br />snd SOO-year recurrence intervals are presented in this report. A <br />detailed deacriptlon of the hydroiogic analyais is contained in Volume <br />II of this study. <br /> <br />Stream gaging records are not available for Sheep Draw. BFA's <br />SWMM ...as used to model rainfall - runoff chsracteristics of the baain. <br />Basin characteristics needed for the model were taken froa U.S. Geolog- <br />ical Survey (USGS) 7.5-Minute Quadrangle ~pping having s scale of <br />1:24 000 wIth a contOur Intervsl of 10 feet. Rainfall vslues for <br />, <br /> <br />urbanhation aSSUIIIS9 the entire baatn 18 urbanized. <br /> <br />I-hour sto~ eventa of vadous frequency "en. oOl..l"e,j f,,,,,, lh" <br />PrecIpitation-Frequency Atlaa of the Western United Statea, Atlas 2, <br />Volume III, Colorado, published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric <br />AdminiatratIon (NOAA) in 1973. The SOO-year rainfall value ...5& <br />extrapolated from the lOO-year and more frequent eventS. Expected <br /> <br />The percent of imperviousness for the land areas WaB eatimated for <br />existing, projected urbanization. and total urbanization conditiona. <br />Table 1 lists the percent of imperviousness for esch land uae that Was <br />conaidered In the hydrologic model. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />" <br />