Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\ <br />\ <br />'t <br /> <br />10\(' <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />FLOOD PLAIN CONDITIONS <br /> <br />Copies were obtained from Gingery Associates of the actual HEC-2 <br />computer runs that were the basis for the Flood Plain and Floodway <br />defined in the Basalt Flood Insurance Study. These computer runs <br />were analyzed to determine a realistic location of the Floodway on <br />the Hyde Park side of the River (Southwest side). Figure 3 (Sheet <br />one of two, 24" x 36" sheets) is a 1" = 100', 5' conto~ interval, <br />topographic map of the site illustrating the location of the 4 <br />cross-sections utilized by previous flood plain studies. Figure 4 <br />(Sheet two of two, 24" x 36" sheets) shows the 4 cross-sections <br />together with the calculated 100-year flood plain levels and the <br />floodway elevation and floodway li~its. <br /> <br />The cross-sections on Figure 4 illustrate that the flood plain area <br />outside the floodway, which is defined as flood fringe, consists of <br />several low areas that meander across the site. <br /> <br />The Floodway Analysis reveals that the entire IOO-year discharge of <br />the Roaring Fork River could be cOnfined to an area far smaller <br />than the defined flood plain with a very small increase in water <br />surface or velocity of flow in the main channel and adjacent <br />overflow area, except in the immediate vicinity of the Emma Road <br />bridge. <br /> <br /> <br />A realistic location for the Floodway limit through Hyde Park is <br />shown on both Figures 3 and 4, together with the required elevation <br />of building pads to maintain elevations at least I foot above the <br />floodway water surface elevation. <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY <br /> <br />The shape of the Hyde Park parcel is such that simply filling the <br />site to a level .above th9 floodway elevation is not practical. <br />Such filling would protect the site itself, but would direct flow <br />to the west, away from the Roaring Fork River. It will be <br />necessary to fill portions of the site, while maintaining a flow <br />path through the site for a portion of the Flood Fringe area flow. <br />The general concept for this approach is illustrated on Figure 3. <br />The details of the plan will require detailed site topography. <br />Final street grades, building siting, and overlot grading will <br />require thorough design to implement the concept. <br /> <br />IMPACT ON ADJACENT PROPERTY <br /> <br />Implementation of the concepts illustrated on Figures 3 and 4 will <br />reduce the flood damage potential to existing properties located <br />northwest of the site. The entire 100-year flood flow of the <br />Roaring Fork River can be passed by the Emma Road Bridge if it can <br />be delivered to that point. Presently, the IOO-year flood would be <br />spread across a wide area when it reaches the Emma Road, resulting <br />in flooding of the housing units located nortllwest of the Hyde Park <br />Parcel. The proposed site grading for Hyde Park would return much <br /> <br />-2- <br />