Laserfiche WebLink
<br />II <br /> <br /> Exceedence Frequency Per Hundred Years <br /> 20 10 5 2 .5 .2 .1 <br /> 20,000 20,000 <br /> A = Sooth St. Vrain Creek at Mouth <br /> 8 = South St. Vrain Creek Downstream <br />! I of Confluence with Middle St. Vrain Creek <br /> C = Middle St. Vrain Creek at Mouth <br /> 10,000 D = Middle Sf. Vrain Creek above 10,000 <br />1\ obove Peacefu I Valley <br /> 8,000 8,000 <br /> 6,000 6,000 <br /> " <br /> c: <br /> 0 <br />II <.> <br />Q) <br />U) <br /> .. 4,000 4,000 <br /> 0- <br /> - <br /> Q) <br /> If <br /> <.> <br /> :a <br />II ::J <br />U <br />.= 2,000 <br /> Q) 2,000 <br /> '" <br /> ~ <br /> 0 <br /> .c: <br /> <.> <br /> UI A <br /> is <br /> -'" <br />II 0 <br />~ B <br /> 1,000 1,000 <br />II 800 800 <br />11 600 C 600 <br /> D <br />II 400 400 <br />11 300 5 300 <br /> 2 10 50 100 500 <br /> Exceedence Interval In Years <br />II <br />II <br /> FIGURE 6. DISCHARGE - FREQUENCY CURVES <br />II <br />II <br /> -. <br /> <br />stations. Rainfall and snowmelt floods were separated in the frequency <br /> <br /> <br />analyses and then statistically combined to obtain the composite flood <br /> <br /> <br />flow frequency curves. <br /> <br /> <br />For a detailed description of the hydrologic analysis, refer to the <br />Technical Addendum. <br /> <br />Hydraulic Analysis <br /> <br /> <br />Analyses of the hydraulic characteristics of the streams in the study <br /> <br /> <br />areas were carried out to provide estimates of the water surface eleva- <br /> <br />tions of floods of the selected recurrence intervals along each stream. <br /> <br /> <br />The water surface elevations were computed through use of the Corps of <br /> <br /> <br />Engineers' HEC-2 step backwater computer program (reference 3). Cross <br /> <br /> <br />sections for the backwater analyses of the south and Middle St. Vrain <br /> <br /> <br />Creeks were field-surveyed at close intervals above and below bridges <br /> <br /> <br />and culverts in order to compute the significant backwater effects of <br /> <br /> <br />these structures. Additional digitized cross sections were secured <br /> <br /> <br />when the topographic maps were compiled (reference 1). The locations <br /> <br /> <br />of the field surveyed cross sections and the digitized cross sections <br /> <br /> <br />from the topographic maps are shown by reference points on the flooded <br /> <br /> <br />area maps (Plates 5 through 39) and the flood profiles (Plates 40 <br /> <br /> <br />through 105). The reference points, 100-year flood elevations and dis- <br /> <br /> <br />charges are also listed in Table 3, page 15. <br /> <br /> <br />Channel roughness coefficient (Manning's "n") for these computations <br /> <br /> <br />were assigned on the basis of field inspection of the floodplain areas. <br /> <br /> <br />The ranges of "n" values for channel and floodplain are sunnnarized <br /> <br /> <br />below: <br /> <br />Table 5 <br />Roughness Coefficients <br /> <br />IInll <br /> <br />Channel <br />Floodplain <br /> <br />.030 - .040 <br />.040 - .060 <br /> <br />A detailed description of the hydraulic analysis is included in the <br />Technical Addendum. <br />