Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. Reducing the danger and suscepti- <br />bility to damages from flooding by <br />keeping people and developments <br />subject to damage out of the flood <br />hazard area or by making such develop- <br />ments more resistant to damage. <br /> <br />financial and social <br />flooding through such <br />insurance and post-flood <br /> <br />. Reducing the <br />impact of <br />measures as <br />assistance. <br /> <br />Table 1 lists the principal <br />measures that can be used in carrying <br />out each of the three strategies. A <br />program combining at least some of the <br />measures from each strategy is usually <br />required for the greatest and most <br />cost-effective reduction of losses. <br /> <br />TABLE 1 <br />STRATEGIES AND HEASURES <br />FOR <br />FLOOD LOSS REDUCTION <br /> <br />Modify Flooding <br />dams and reservoirs <br />levees and walls <br />channel alterations <br />diversions <br />land treatment <br />onsite detention <br /> <br />Modify Susceptibility to Flooding <br />floodplain regulations <br />development and redevelopment <br />warning and preparedness <br />floodproofing <br /> <br />Modify Impact of Flooding <br />flood insurance <br />relief and recovery <br /> <br />The principal <br />each measure are <br />following sections. <br /> <br />characteristics of <br />described in the <br /> <br />Measures Modifying Flooding <br /> <br />Each of the measures for reducing <br />flooding is intended to protect an area <br />rather than a particular property or <br />person. Most--but not all--involve <br /> <br />heavy construction and a high capital <br />cost. As a result, most measures in <br />this category are usually undertaken as <br />public projects. <br /> <br />The measures that require signi- <br />ficant amounts of construction also <br />share several disadvantages including: <br /> <br />- j <br /> <br />. Lengthy and complex planning and <br />design. <br /> <br />. Potential for making flood damages <br />outside the project area more severe. <br /> <br />. Potential for major losses if design <br />levels are exceeded. <br /> <br />. Potential for creating a <br />of security about the <br />protection provided. <br /> <br />false sense <br />extent of <br /> <br />. Need for careful and costly routine <br />inspection, operation and maintenance. <br /> <br />. Possible detrimental effects to the <br />natural environment. <br /> <br />The main attraction for these <br />measures is that they require rela- <br />tively little disruption to homes, <br />businesses and life styles for most <br />floodplain occupants. <br /> <br />Dams and Reservoirs <br /> <br />Reservoirs capture and <br />temporarily hold floodwaters upstream <br />of flood-prone areas. Excess water is <br />gradually released after the flood <br />threat has passed. Use of dams requires <br />sites capable of storing sufficient <br />amounts of water which are upstream but <br />fair ly close to the area to be protec- <br />ted. In addition, the location must <br />normally be "available" in the sense <br />that it does not contain significant <br />urban development or sites warranting <br />preservation for historical or other <br />reasons. <br /> <br />1 <br />I <br /> <br />. I <br /> <br />Reservoirs have the potential for <br />reducing flooding in several downstream <br />communities rather than protecting <br />single areas as with some flood-modify- <br />ing measures. Another advantage lS <br />their potential for serving other uses, <br /> <br />10 <br />