Laserfiche WebLink
<br />design will probably ensue based on the analysis performed. Table I presents <br />a summary of results of selected optimization runs, An important revelation <br />from this application was that it is possible to quantitatively determine a measure <br />of the effect of a number of interesting system conditions, e.g., land-use controls. <br />Also, the range of component sizes that are optimum under a variety of assumed <br />conditions was limited in most instances so that considerable confidence was <br />developed in system component sizes. The studies indicated a meaningful role <br />for land-use controls as a component of an urban flood-control system and, <br />to a limited extent, quantified its contribution and explicitly evaluated its role. <br />No additional development work is contemplated before the technique is applied <br />to the Harding Ditch area. It should be possible in the Harding Ditch study <br /> <br />? <br /> <br />TABLE 1.-Summary of Selected Optimization Runs. Blue Waters Ditch. in thousands <br />of dollars <br /> <br /> All <br /> pump, EF, EF, EF, EF, EF, <br /> PT = 100, PT = 100, no PT, PT = 100, PT = 100, <br /> System 6-7/8% 6-7/8% 6-7/8% 6-7/8% 3-1/4% <br />condition at 50, NS' at 50, NS at 50, NS at 50, MS at 100, NS <br /> (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) <br />System capital cost 24,600 16,880 13,229 24,800 17,000 <br />Amortized capital cost 1,777 1.204 944 1,771 578 <br />Operation, maintenance, <br />power. and replacement <br />cost 94 61 45 66 61 <br />Total annual cost 1,870 1,265 988 1,838 639 <br />Existing annual damages 1.085 1,085 1,085 1,085 1,085 <br />Residual annual damages 25 49 106 23 50 <br />Annual damage reduction 1.060 1,036 979 1,062 1,035 <br />System net benefits -811 -229 -9 -776 396 <br />Optimum Goose Lake <br />storage 200 acre-ft 800 acre-ft 1,800 acre.ft 600 acre-ft 800 acre-ft <br />Optimum Blue Waters <br />storage 400 acre-ft 1,400 acre-ft 1,700 acre-ft 1,200 acre-ft 1,400 acre-ft <br />Optimum Pump capacity 7;000 cfs 2,600 cfs 1,l00cfs 3,300 cfs 2,600 cfs <br /> <br />. Pumping is emphasized by requiring all flow to be pumped that is in excess of the natural capability <br />of existing system to provide lOO-yr protection. <br />Note: EF = existing land use assumed for future; CF = controlled future land use; PI = exceedence <br />interval performance target; N~ = natural storage; MS = excavation in detention areas that modify <br />the storage. <br /> <br />to further test the methodology as to its value in plan formulation and evaluation <br />studies, If the results of the initial application in the Blue Waters .Ditch plan <br />formulation studies are an indication of its utility, it will have considerable <br />value in studies where a range of alternative systems with a number of components <br />are to be studied. <br /> <br />'2 <br /> <br />INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS AND OUTPUT RESULTS <br /> <br />The technique has been designed to be consistent with plan formulation <br />strategies in use by many Corps of Engineers offices that are studying urban <br />