My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01555
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01555
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:58:15 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:06:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Community
Jefferson County Unincorporated
Title
Flood Insurance Study - Jefferson County Unincorporated Areas, Volume 1 of 6
Date
7/4/1989
Prepared For
Jefferson County
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />III distribut~on. At each of 15 USGS gag~ng stations with at <br />least 15 years of record, two annual peak flood series were <br />determined, respectively, for the rain events and snowmelt events <br />from streamflow charts. Three statistical parameters, the m~an, <br />standard dev~ation, and skew, which dehne che log-Pearson Type <br />III distribution, were then computed for each type of flood event. <br />The statistical parameters are intuitively dependent on watershed <br />character~stics and hydrometeorologic cond~c~ons ~n che reg~on. <br />Two bas1.n parameters, drainage area and mean watershed elevat~on, <br />which most significantly affect the magnitudes of floods, are <br />regarded as independent variables in the discharge prediccive <br />regression analyses. The regression equations, including only che <br />significant independent variables for each type of event, were <br />used co compute the flood-frequency curve aC any ungaged site, <br />given the drainage area and mean watershed elevation. These two <br />frequency curves, one for rain events and the other for snowmelt <br />events, were then statistically combined to give a composite <br />flood-frequency curve that defines the flood-frequency curve for <br />the ungaged site in question. <br /> <br />Discharges for streams with less than 15 square miles of drainage <br />area were calculated using the Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure <br />(CURP) (Reference 14). The 10-, 50-, and 100-year discharges were <br />calculated directly, whereas the 500-year was estimated by extrap- <br />olation. Peak discharges at selected locations in the study area <br />were obtained by rout~ng CURP flood hydrographs for each subbas~n. <br /> <br />Peak discharges for the South Platte River were developed as part <br />of the Flood Insurance Study for Douglas County (Reference 2). In <br />that study, a log-Pearson Type III analysis (Reference 13) was <br />used to calculate the discharges. Streamflow data from USGS <br />stream-gaging stations located at South Platte (gage No. 06707500) <br />and below Cheesman Lake (gage No. 06701500) were used in the <br />frequency analysis. <br /> <br />The hydrologic analyses for Lena Gulch upstream of West 6th <br />Avenue, Jackson Gulch, Kenneys Run, and Clear Creek upstream of <br />the Burlington Northern Railroad were developed as part of the <br />Flood Insurance Study for the City of Golden (Reference 1). In <br />that study, the peak discharges for Clear Creek above the <br />Burlington Northern Railroad were obtained from the COE, Omaha <br />D~strict (Reference 15). The COE established peak discharge- <br />frequency relationsh~ps for floods of 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year <br />recurrence intervals. A log-Pearson Type III analysis <br />(Reference 13) was conducted on the discharge records for che <br />Clear Creek USGS stream gages at Golden (1911-1976) and Derby <br />(1934-1976); however, the statistical parameters compuced by these <br />methods were not suffic~ently reliable to pred~ct che frequency of <br />extreme events. In lieu of a discharge-frequency analysis, a <br />rainfall-runoff approach was used. The Massachusetts Institute of <br />Technology Catchment Model (Reference 16) <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.