Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Van Bibber Tributary - Ramstetter Reservoir, which is located at <br />the upstream end of the area studied, near State Highway 93, pro- <br />vides minimal routing effect to the peak discharges. <br /> <br />3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />For the flooding sources studied in detail in the cOllllllunity, standard <br />hydrologic and hydrauhc study methods were used to determine the flood <br />hazard data required for this study. Flood events of a magnitude which <br />are expected to be equaled or exceeded once on the average during any <br />10-, 50-, 100-, or 500-year period (recurrence interval) have been se- <br />lected as having special significance for flood plain management and for <br />flood insurance rates. These events, cOllllllonly termed the 10-, 50-, <br />100-, and 500-year floods, have a 10, 2, 1, and 0.2 percent chance, <br />respectively, of being equaled or exceeded during any year. Although <br />the recurrence interval represents the long-term average period between <br />floods of a specific magnitude, rare floods could occur at short <br />intervals or even within the same year. The risk of exper1encing a rare <br />flood increases when periods greater than 1 year are considered. For <br />example, the risk of having a flood which equals or exceeds the 100-year <br />flood (1 percent chance of annual exceedence) in any 50-year period is <br />approximately 40 percent (4 in 10), and, for any 90-year period, the <br />risk increases to approximately 60 percent (6 in 10). The analyses <br />reported herein reflect flood1ng potentials based on conditions existing <br />in the cOllllllunity at the time of completion of this study. Maps and <br />flood elevations w1ll be amended periodically to reflect future changes. <br /> <br />3.1 Hydrologic Analyses <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish the peak dis- <br />charge-frequency relationships for each flood1ng source studied 1n <br />detail affecting the cOllllllunity. <br /> <br />Detailed discussions of the hydrologic analyses for the streams <br />studied by the study contractor were presented in previous <br />hydrology reports. The hydrologic analyses for Cold Spring, Kerr, <br />Swede, and Switzer Gulches, and the SJCD 6200 North Tributary were <br />discussed in a 1982 hydrology report (Reference II). The <br />remainder of the 8 treams were discussed in a four-part technica 1 <br />addendum prepared in 1979 (Reference 12). <br /> <br />Discharges for streams with drainage areas greater than 15 square <br />miles were calculated using a log-Pearson Type III frequency anal- <br />ysis (Reference 13). As is typical in Colorado, flood events in <br />the study area comprise two distinct and generally independent <br />populations (i.e., rain and snowmelt floods). For this reason, it <br />was necessary to analyze the rain and snowmelt events separately. <br />Each type of flood event was assumed to follow log-Pearson Type <br /> <br />9 <br />