My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01459
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01459
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:07:19 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:03:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Gunnison
Community
Uncompahgre Valley
Title
Upper Gunnison-Uncompahgre Basin Phase 1 Feasibility Study Summary Report
Date
5/1/1989
Prepared For
Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Authority
Prepared By
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Gunnison Tunnel diversion demands are consistently met and Blue Mesa <br />Reservoir releases are able to maintain the target 300 cfs minimum instream <br />flow in the Black Canyon under Scenario 2B. <br /> <br />6.3 SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVE PLANS <br /> <br />The six alternative plans were screened by the Study Team and reviewed by <br />the Authority, the project sponsors, the Technical Steering Committee, and the <br />Advi sory Committee. The following screening factors were used: abil ity to <br />meet target objectives; environmental effects; potential benefits; <br />institutional/ social factors; and cost. Table 6.5 presents a summary of the <br />screeni ng results. The rel at ive rank assigned to each alternati ve pl ans is <br />presented below: <br /> <br />Plan Rank <br />A lternat i ve 5 1 <br />A lternat i ve 6 2 <br />Alternative 1 3 <br />Alternative 3 4 <br />A lternat i ve 4 5 <br />A lternat i ve 2 6 <br /> <br />Alternative 5 was selected as the top ranked plan mainly because it meets <br />the target objectives in a balanced manner with relatively few adverse <br />environmental impacts. The two reservoirs included in this alternative would <br />be able to reduce the total average annual irrigation depletion shortage in <br />the Study Area by about 60 percent. Furthermore, the hydrologic model results <br />indicate that the reservoirs can provide releases to meet enhanced streamflow <br />targets below each dam and would have reservoir fluctuations which would allow <br />the development of a flatwater recreation facility at each reservoir. Both <br />reservoirs could alleviate flooding which takes place periodically. Although <br />the No-Action scenario did not identify any M&I shortages in the study area, <br />the water that is stored for the purpose of instream flow enhancement could <br />possibly be stored under a transferred City of Gunnison storage decree. This <br /> <br />6-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.