My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01312
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01312
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:39:52 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:55:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Title
Multi-Objective Flood Mitigation Plan for Vermillion River Basin-South Dakota
Date
1/1/1994
Prepared For
South Dakota
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />information about obtaining funding can be <br />found in a companion document. Catalog of <br />Grants and Assistance for Multi-objective <br />Management. but direct contact with the <br />organizations is always the surest approach. <br />Making a chart of the different agency pro- <br />grams and the funding they provide for each <br />solution may make this easier. <br /> <br />BE PRACTICAL <br />It is quite possible that funding. political sup- <br />port. or other prerequisites for the highest- <br />priority solutions will not be readily available. <br />Thai is why the implementation strategy <br />should be flexible. and should include the <br />widest possible range of projects, some of <br />which can be carried out fairly easily or inex- <br />pensively. The idea is to approach implemen- <br />lation from many angles simultaneously so <br />that at least some approaches will succeed and <br /> <br />others can at least be started even if they can- <br />not be finished right away. This will provide <br />enough latitude to explore a few alternatives <br />at a time and follow up on the one or ones for <br />which funding is available. popular support is <br />strong. etc. This will prevent the whole Slrat. <br />egy from being stalled while everyone waits <br />for a specific project to be done. <br /> <br />EVALUATE PROGRESS <br />Periodic evalualions will help tell whether the <br />goals are being met. assess the quantity and <br />quality of progress. and ensure that the goals <br />and objectives are still in focus. If the goals are <br />stated in measurable terms, as described above. <br />it will be easy to tell what has and has nOI been <br />accomplished. In addition. these questions <br />should be asked: Were the desired results <br />achieved? If not. what was achieved? How well <br />was it done? What benefits were realized? What <br /> <br />G <br /> <br />problems were unexpected? Contingencies <br />thai arise should be noted. like additional goals <br />thai were discovered in the process, or changes <br />that had 10 be made during implementation. <br />These can then be incorporated into the next <br />phase of the implementation strategy. <br />Periodic evaluations will also improve <br />the chances for future successful projects. The <br />following can be drawn from a project evalu- <br />ation: specific results, lists of bene fits realized. <br />realistic information about costs, and solid <br />facts about positive environmental impacts. <br />Decisionmakers appreciate receiving this type <br />of information. It makes their jobs easier. and <br />reinforces their commitment to supporting <br />and funding future projects. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.