Laserfiche WebLink
<br />David Walker <br />Page 2 <br />May 19, 1982 <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />Paragraph <br /> <br />112 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />114 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />119 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />119 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />ag <br /> <br />cc: NE Region <br /> <br />Remarks <br /> <br />Add "drastically" before reduced in the last <br />sentence and delete "but probably not eliminated." <br /> <br />Discuss the impact of each alternative in the <br />resource as was done for economics (pg. 105). <br /> <br />The purpose of Colorado's inflow stream law is <br />to preserve the existing "environment." It does <br />benefit the fisheries but is more inclusive which <br />should be mentioned. <br /> <br />Shouldn't the Corps of Engineer's proposed study <br />of the Denver Water Board Systemwide EIS be <br />included here? <br />