My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01124
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01124
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:58:24 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:47:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Boulder
Stream Name
South Boulder Creek
Title
South Boulder Creek/ Flatirons
Date
12/5/1997
Prepared For
Boulder
Prepared By
Consultants
Floodplain - Doc Type
Community File
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br />'" I '~-.... <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Our consultant has concluded that the levee as it exists today reduces the amount <br />of overflow into what has come to be called the West Valley Overflow. Also, <br />because the area behind the levee has now been lowered through mining <br />activities, loss of the levee without a replacement strategy would definitely <br />increase the hazard to downstream developed areas. <br /> <br />3. You asked "Whether (we) support FEMA recognition of the dike for FEMA <br />mapping purposes. " <br /> <br />There are two related issues involved in your question which I would like to <br />expand upon. As far as FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Maps are concerned, their <br />policy (as I understand it) is that a levee must go through their 5-step <br />certification process before they will recognize it on their maps. However, in this <br />case, FEMA has already recognized the levee on their maps even though they <br />have not yet certified it according to their 5-step process. Therefore, I cannot, <br />and will not, guess at how FEMA might resolve this dilemma should Flatirons be <br />prevented from obtaining certification of the levee. It is my understanding that <br />the City of Boulder requested that FEMA amend their maps to show the pre- <br />levee floodplain, but that FEMA declined to do so because they recognized that <br />the topography behind the levee had changed. Seemingly the two options <br />remaining to FEMA if the levee is not certified are to either recognize the levee <br />anyway and keep the current maps, or redefine the floodplain based on the <br />current topography, which would impact a large number of structures in the West <br />Valley Overflow area as noted above. <br /> <br />My second point in response to your question is that we would support FEMA <br />levee certification regardless of the impact on the maps because it adds a level of <br />assurance of the present and future integrity of the structure. <br /> <br />As you know, I will be out of town on the date of the hearing. However if you or anyone <br />else reading this letter has any questions regarding any of the above, please feel free to <br />contact me at any time. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br /> <br />Bill DeGroot, .E. <br />Chief, Floodplain Management Program <br /> <br />WGD/gb <br />cc: Scott Tucker <br />Alan Taylor, City of Boulder <br />Curt Parker, Boulder County <br />Larry Lang, Colorado Water ConselVation Board <br />John Liou, FEMA <br /> <br />\fIood'bilNipaln <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.