My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01059
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01059
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:11:46 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:43:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Elbert
El Paso
Community
Elbert and El Paso Counties
Stream Name
Kiowa Creek, Bijou Creek
Title
Report on Flood and Erosion Problems and Control Kiowa and Bijou Creek Basins
Date
1/1/1950
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />j' <br /> <br />wa ters followed by very dry peri ods during which the winds, which have a pre- <br />dominantly easterly direction, deposit silt and sand on the western banks, thus <br />gradually pushing the waters into a channel farther to the east. <br /> <br />! <br />I, <br />, <br />" <br /> <br />In 1909 a large diversion dan and off-channel reservoir, known as the <br />'~~st Nile, was constructed in Adams County approximately five miles below the <br />c0nfluence of the East and West Bijou Creeks. Considerable private capital was <br />invested in this irrigation project, which might have been successful except for <br />the fact that a large amount of silt accumulated above the dam and around the <br />Gates, and after only a few years of not too successful operation the diversion <br />dam was completely washed out during a flood and the project was abandoned. <br /> <br />There has been some individual effort on the part of ranchers and land- <br />o~ners in this lONer basin to control the bank cutting, but in general the prob- <br />lRm is too great to be met by measures such individuals are able to install with- <br />out the aid of heavy equipment and technical advice. Further, it is recognized <br />that the source of the destruction is in the upper part of the basins and must be <br />r~ntrolled in those areas before successDll conservation measures can be accom- <br />p1ished downstream. <br /> <br />In the upper basins of the Kiova and Bijou Creeks the problem is somewhat <br />,:ifferent. AlthouCh floodcraters here "lso menace life and property as in the <br />]mrer basins, the almost constant process by which rainfall and snow runoff is <br />removing the fertile topsoil ~nd depositing it farther d~mstream constitutes <br />the major problem of the upper basins. Luch irreparable damaGe has also been <br />done in this area by the sa:~ding of meadow lands during floods. <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br /> <br />\ <br />! <br /> <br />FollowinG a major flood in 1945 the Corps of Zngineers constructed dikes <br />along the mair. channel in the Vicinity of the towns of Kiowa and ;Ubert on Kiowa <br />Creek to protect the properties and citizens of those towns. These dikes are <br />apparently soundly engineered and constructed, but it is not inconceivable that <br />a flood of similar proportions to that experienced in 1935 would not only skirt <br />the upstream boundaries of the dikes but also overtop them and again inundate <br />the towns. <br /> <br />Many soil stabilization and runoff control practices have been carried out <br />in the headwaters regions of the two creeks and their tributary drainages. The <br />Soil Conservation Service of the Department of Agriculture reports that since <br />1941, 241 stockwater and flood control dams have been construct3d, 14 miles of <br />terracing and 24 miles of diversions by ditches and dikes have ,been built, 966 <br />acres of land contoured with heavy furrows, and 4676 acres of land seeded to <br />grasses. In addition, the Civilian Conservation Corps completed some similar <br />work, although there is no available record of its extent. <br /> <br />All of this conservation work was accomplished in small drainage areas <br />tributary to the nBin streams, and the dams and dikes average about seven to ten <br />feet in height and 150 to 200 feet in lenGth. The capacity of the reservoirs <br />ranges between one a:1d ten acre feet. Those classified as flood control dams <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.