Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Service Areas ~O. g.lO. and 11. <br />No Major improvemelltsareproposed for tllese service <Irea5. <br />48-lnch o~tfall on North 7th Avenue is adequate for existing and <br />development. <br /> <br /> <br />105 <br /> <br />..---=--- <br /> <br />Th, <br />future <br /> <br />facility to prevent oackwater floo~ing and signlflCdlltly reduce <br />discharge peaks downstrean. Detention storage upstredm would dlso <br />reducebackWdterflooding in Service Area 6. Tile Jowerpeak flows <br />downstream resulting from s~ch 5torage WQul~ slgnif1cantly reduce the <br />head necessary to push water through the culvert and bridges beneath <br />the .~. ]hway and railrOdd tracks. <br /> <br />Pioneer Ditch Imorove~ents <br />ThePioneerOitchshouldberoutinelyclearedofsmall trees, <br />brush. and other debri s throughout Its length. tn the ~pper reaCh, <br />the dftch has almost enough cross-section area to carry the 5-year <br />flood. However, most ~ri!:'lolry crossings, as for exa~ple. the 48.inch <br />culvert beneath Highway 14 are grossly under s1ze. If these were <br />replaced with adequately sized hydraulic structures. and tile right- <br />angle bends on Franklin and North 7th Avenue were smoothed out, the <br />ditch would function more efficiently during flood events. Recommended <br />design flows for various recurrence interval floods are summarized in <br />Tablel7. As a minimum. all hydraulic structures should be designed <br />to saft!iy pa"" tht!10-j'ear f1ecd. <br />In the lower reach of Pioneer Ditch (North 7th Avenue and Franklin <br />to High"ay 138). the ditch should be erllar'1oo. At the proposed dete~ti:m <br />storage site the ditch should ha~e a minimum cross-sectional area of <br />210 ft2 below elevation 3,922. Even if the size of t~e ditch were <br />increased, 5 ~nd la-year recurrence interval floods would cause miner <br />floooinginservicearea7. Howevllr,ifdetentionstoragewerea]so <br />provided at a location north of the ditch opposite the drainage lateral <br />Chat currently services Areas 7 and 8. backwater flooding would be less <br />likely to occur. The proposed capacity of this reservoir would be <br />approximately 150 Acre-feet. It would have a surface area of approximately <br />25 acres as seen in Figure 18. Excavation of tllis area below the flow <br />line of Pioneer Oitch "ould create a pond, which would provide an <br />u '.'f"~ ,~~ ~"~~~''''~'1 "M~"'at~c~ area ~e" !Io:e city <br />J..rQ.... .~ ..,,~ .~........_ . _"' _ <br />A number of OPtions i"xist forooerating the proposed detention <br />pond during times of flood. For example. it could be designed to <br />5 f . <,..,,, fer lat.... ....le~~.. in t~e <br />store f>torm runoff frcr:'. crv ce r.reJ~ ~,; ~ . _ . <br />. " ",-. ~i,h flows iro the dj teh could spill into t!lis storage <br />altc". ,," <br /> <br />Ditch Relocation <br />For many years, the existing PiOneer Ditch has served its purpose <br />well as a drainage ditoh. The grade and alignment of this channel was <br />or'ginally selected to prOvide the most efficient use of the land for <br />f~rming. However. with recent urban development the ditCh is befng <br />increasingly relied upon to function as a flOOd channel in addition to <br />serving its original purpose of maintaining a lower water table. Because <br />the bends and extre~.ely flat gradient considerably limit its abflity to <br />effiCiently carry s~orm runoff, the o~erflow and b<lckwater flOOding <br />previously discussed Will continue to be a persistent problem for the City. <br />Realignment of the dftch between Highway 14 and Division Avenue as <br />shown in Figure 18. would reduce bend losses, shortero the ditch by <br />approximately 25 percent. and ir.crease the gradient. Because the new <br />ditch segment would confonn more closely to the natural Sand Creek channel <br />andfJoodplain, the flood1.ay area would be easier tOlllaintain. ThefJoodwdy <br />could serve a dllal purpose. as for example. a direct transportati onllnk <br />around the City between Highway 14 and Highway 138. <br />Taole 17 sUfIlna.ri~es estimated flood discharges in the Pioneer Ditch <br />assuming tnat all trtdjor flood control structures were in place. This <br />water would caLIse tnereSldualdamage(S79,700.00peryear}Shcwnin <br />Fi!iure14 If portions of the ditch were relocHed and enlarged as <br />discussed above. residual da~ges could be Significantly reduced. More- <br />over, the floo~ay shown in Plates 2 - 19 could also be reduced. allowing <br />more efficient land use. <br />:.JIll Ie realignment and enlargeeentof the dftchwOuld O('a costly <br />altcr:1Jtive. the improved hy<lraulic efficiency and othl'r mitiqat,ng results <br />merl t serious cons idl'rJtion by t.~e CI ty of Sterl lng. The area through <br />Which the realigned ditch lo(luld be cons:r"cted is largely undevel oped. <br />h~nce the transi tion could take place as part of.l long-term planning <br />process. <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br /> <br />