Laserfiche WebLink
<br />64 <br /> <br />FLOODS IN COLORADO <br /> <br />of precipitation was recorded, the rise in the creek due to it had passed <br />before the main flood reached Denver. From statements of residents <br />throughout the basin it appears that the heaviest precipitation <br />occurred in the lower half of the basin, extending from Franktown to <br />a point about 5 miles north of Denver, and that the rain was particu' <br />larly heavy below Parkcr. In this section the rain was so intcrmingled <br />with hail and came down so fast that it was said to be difficult to See <br />a hundred yards. The precipitation above Franktown was slight and, <br />according to J. Eo Field (see p. 62), did not extend to Castlewood <br />Dam. The storm apparently traveled in a northwesterly direction <br />and covered the entire basin, although with varying degrees of inten- <br />sity, At Franktown the rain was heaviest about 2:30 p. m., continuing <br />steadily for scveral hours. Betwecn Franktown and Parker the storm <br />was at its maximum between 3 and 4 p. m., and below Parker the <br />maximum occurred from 4 to 4:20 p. m. The rain caused every dry <br />gulch to run bank full, and as the storm apparently traveled down- <br />stream at about the same rate as the water in Cherry Creek, the <br />cumulative effect was nearly the maximum for a storm of that inten- <br />sity. The banks of Cherry Creek, being low, were flooded in numerous <br />plnces. <br />The Cherry Creek Flood Commission cstimatcd that the flood <br />originated in the run-off from an area of less than 200 square miles, <br />. and that the greater part came from an area not exceeding 100 square <br />milos, Two points were selected by the Commission for slope-area <br />measurements of the peak flow, based on the cross section to the high- <br />j water mark and the slope of the creek bed, using 0.030 as the value for <br />n in Kutter's formula. One was at the Montgomery Bridge above <br />Parker, where the diseharge was found to be 14,500 second-feet. <br />The other was below the mouth of Goldsmith Gulch, about a mile <br />upstream from the city limits, where a diseharge of about 25,000 <br />second-feet was indicated. In view of the results obtained in Denver, <br />as described below, it is believed that tile figure for Goldsmith Gulch <br />is too high, cven allowing for the flatteniug effect of storage between <br />the two plaees, and for the longer peak in Dcnver, <br />In Denver, Chcrry Creek started to rise shortly aftcr 8 p, m., and <br />reached its maximum stage at 10 p. m., when it was 11 fcct deep at the <br />Bannock Street Bridge. Soon afterward it began to fall and by mid- <br />night had fallen 8 feet. At 8 o'clnek the next morning it had fallen <br />another foot, to a depth of 2 feet in the channel, and eontinucd to <br />recede slowly. <br />The Flood Commission made no estimate of the peak flow in Den- <br />ver, W. B. Freeman, consulting engineer, formerly a member of the <br />Geological Survey, made a float determination of the velocity in the <br />. main channel about midnight, when the stage was 5 feet lower than the <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />MAJOR FLOODS-SOUTH PLATTE RIVER <br /> <br />65 <br /> <br />crest of the flood, and from this and the eross-13eetional area at the <br />peak, ineluding the overflow, estimated the peak discharge as 11 ,000 <br />second-feet. He further estimated the total discharge for the 12-hour <br />period 8 p. m. July 14 to 8 a. m. July 15 as 4,000 acre-feet. C. W. <br />Comstock," State engineer, in an account of this flood in Denver, <br />states that the peak discharge at the gaging station on the South <br />Platte River a short distance below the mouth of Cherry Creck was <br />12,000 seeond-fcet, of which he estimated that 10,000 second-feet <br />came from Cherry Creek. His estimate of the total discharge was <br />3,800 acre-feet. <br />'fhe severe overflow was due to the fact that the channel had a <br />capacity of only 6,000 second-feet. After the flood the capacity was <br />increased to 10,000 second-feet. <br />The flood of July 28, 1922, caused by heavy rainfall over the upper <br />part of the basin, was a major flood for the upper part but not for <br />the lower, as channel and vaHey storage so reduced its peak flow that <br />it did not overflow the channel of the creek in Denver, although <br />reaching the top of the retaining walls. It did, however, increase <br />the flow of the South Platte River below the mouth of the ereek to <br />such an extent that the South Platte River flooded several blocks at <br />GlobeviJIe, in the lower part of Denver. A few days after the flood <br />the Geological Survey and the State engineer's office made a joint <br />investigation, the results of which have been published." The heavy <br />rainfall covered an area extending 3 miles north of Parker, 1 mile <br />south of Franktown, to the Douglas County line on the cast, and 4 <br />miles .west of the creek. <br />The heaviest rainfall was in the basin of Bayou Gulch, At a point <br />3 miles above the mouth of Bayou Gulch in scc. 30, T. 7 S., R. 65 W" <br />the storm began about 2 p. m. and lasted for 2 hours. The total <br />rainfall was about 3}j inches as measured in an iron wheelbarrow with <br />nearly vertical sides, The precipitation was so intense that the water <br />stood 2 feet deep in the road. The resulting flood at Bayou Gulch <br />was the highest in nearly 50 ycars. At a point 1 mile above the mouth <br />of the gulch the heavy rain lasted 45 minutes and the flood crest was <br />reached about 3:45 p. m., remaining near that stage for one hour. <br />Heavy rain at the mouth of the gulch is reported to have lasted one <br />hour, Hallway betwcen Bayou Gulch and Parker, in sec, 3, T. 7 S., <br />R. 66 W., the rain lasted from 2 to 4 p. m., and amounted to 2 inches <br />as measured in a washtub in the yard. The rise in Cherry Creek came <br />abont 3 p. m. A Weather Bureau station 4 miles east of Parker <br />recorded 1.01 inches for the 24-hour period, but at Castle Rock 6 <br /> <br />II Comstock, O. W" The Cherry Creek flood, Denv6J', Colo.: Eng. News, vol. 68, pp. 302-305, Aug. I&. <br />1912- <br />II Follansbl'8. Robert, and Bodgu, ~. V., SOlDe fltods in the Rock)' MountaIn region: tJ. 8. 080]. <br />Survey Water-Supply Paper 620, pp. 122-123,1925, <br />