<br />64
<br />
<br />FLOODS IN COLORADO
<br />
<br />of precipitation was recorded, the rise in the creek due to it had passed
<br />before the main flood reached Denver. From statements of residents
<br />throughout the basin it appears that the heaviest precipitation
<br />occurred in the lower half of the basin, extending from Franktown to
<br />a point about 5 miles north of Denver, and that the rain was particu'
<br />larly heavy below Parkcr. In this section the rain was so intcrmingled
<br />with hail and came down so fast that it was said to be difficult to See
<br />a hundred yards. The precipitation above Franktown was slight and,
<br />according to J. Eo Field (see p. 62), did not extend to Castlewood
<br />Dam. The storm apparently traveled in a northwesterly direction
<br />and covered the entire basin, although with varying degrees of inten-
<br />sity, At Franktown the rain was heaviest about 2:30 p. m., continuing
<br />steadily for scveral hours. Betwecn Franktown and Parker the storm
<br />was at its maximum between 3 and 4 p. m., and below Parker the
<br />maximum occurred from 4 to 4:20 p. m. The rain caused every dry
<br />gulch to run bank full, and as the storm apparently traveled down-
<br />stream at about the same rate as the water in Cherry Creek, the
<br />cumulative effect was nearly the maximum for a storm of that inten-
<br />sity. The banks of Cherry Creek, being low, were flooded in numerous
<br />plnces.
<br />The Cherry Creek Flood Commission cstimatcd that the flood
<br />originated in the run-off from an area of less than 200 square miles,
<br />. and that the greater part came from an area not exceeding 100 square
<br />milos, Two points were selected by the Commission for slope-area
<br />measurements of the peak flow, based on the cross section to the high-
<br />j water mark and the slope of the creek bed, using 0.030 as the value for
<br />n in Kutter's formula. One was at the Montgomery Bridge above
<br />Parker, where the diseharge was found to be 14,500 second-feet.
<br />The other was below the mouth of Goldsmith Gulch, about a mile
<br />upstream from the city limits, where a diseharge of about 25,000
<br />second-feet was indicated. In view of the results obtained in Denver,
<br />as described below, it is believed that tile figure for Goldsmith Gulch
<br />is too high, cven allowing for the flatteniug effect of storage between
<br />the two plaees, and for the longer peak in Dcnver,
<br />In Denver, Chcrry Creek started to rise shortly aftcr 8 p, m., and
<br />reached its maximum stage at 10 p. m., when it was 11 fcct deep at the
<br />Bannock Street Bridge. Soon afterward it began to fall and by mid-
<br />night had fallen 8 feet. At 8 o'clnek the next morning it had fallen
<br />another foot, to a depth of 2 feet in the channel, and eontinucd to
<br />recede slowly.
<br />The Flood Commission made no estimate of the peak flow in Den-
<br />ver, W. B. Freeman, consulting engineer, formerly a member of the
<br />Geological Survey, made a float determination of the velocity in the
<br />. main channel about midnight, when the stage was 5 feet lower than the
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />MAJOR FLOODS-SOUTH PLATTE RIVER
<br />
<br />65
<br />
<br />crest of the flood, and from this and the eross-13eetional area at the
<br />peak, ineluding the overflow, estimated the peak discharge as 11 ,000
<br />second-feet. He further estimated the total discharge for the 12-hour
<br />period 8 p. m. July 14 to 8 a. m. July 15 as 4,000 acre-feet. C. W.
<br />Comstock," State engineer, in an account of this flood in Denver,
<br />states that the peak discharge at the gaging station on the South
<br />Platte River a short distance below the mouth of Cherry Creck was
<br />12,000 seeond-fcet, of which he estimated that 10,000 second-feet
<br />came from Cherry Creek. His estimate of the total discharge was
<br />3,800 acre-feet.
<br />'fhe severe overflow was due to the fact that the channel had a
<br />capacity of only 6,000 second-feet. After the flood the capacity was
<br />increased to 10,000 second-feet.
<br />The flood of July 28, 1922, caused by heavy rainfall over the upper
<br />part of the basin, was a major flood for the upper part but not for
<br />the lower, as channel and vaHey storage so reduced its peak flow that
<br />it did not overflow the channel of the creek in Denver, although
<br />reaching the top of the retaining walls. It did, however, increase
<br />the flow of the South Platte River below the mouth of the ereek to
<br />such an extent that the South Platte River flooded several blocks at
<br />GlobeviJIe, in the lower part of Denver. A few days after the flood
<br />the Geological Survey and the State engineer's office made a joint
<br />investigation, the results of which have been published." The heavy
<br />rainfall covered an area extending 3 miles north of Parker, 1 mile
<br />south of Franktown, to the Douglas County line on the cast, and 4
<br />miles .west of the creek.
<br />The heaviest rainfall was in the basin of Bayou Gulch, At a point
<br />3 miles above the mouth of Bayou Gulch in scc. 30, T. 7 S., R. 65 W"
<br />the storm began about 2 p. m. and lasted for 2 hours. The total
<br />rainfall was about 3}j inches as measured in an iron wheelbarrow with
<br />nearly vertical sides, The precipitation was so intense that the water
<br />stood 2 feet deep in the road. The resulting flood at Bayou Gulch
<br />was the highest in nearly 50 ycars. At a point 1 mile above the mouth
<br />of the gulch the heavy rain lasted 45 minutes and the flood crest was
<br />reached about 3:45 p. m., remaining near that stage for one hour.
<br />Heavy rain at the mouth of the gulch is reported to have lasted one
<br />hour, Hallway betwcen Bayou Gulch and Parker, in sec, 3, T. 7 S.,
<br />R. 66 W., the rain lasted from 2 to 4 p. m., and amounted to 2 inches
<br />as measured in a washtub in the yard. The rise in Cherry Creek came
<br />abont 3 p. m. A Weather Bureau station 4 miles east of Parker
<br />recorded 1.01 inches for the 24-hour period, but at Castle Rock 6
<br />
<br />II Comstock, O. W" The Cherry Creek flood, Denv6J', Colo.: Eng. News, vol. 68, pp. 302-305, Aug. I&.
<br />1912-
<br />II Follansbl'8. Robert, and Bodgu, ~. V., SOlDe fltods in the Rock)' MountaIn region: tJ. 8. 080].
<br />Survey Water-Supply Paper 620, pp. 122-123,1925,
<br />
|