Laserfiche WebLink
<br />62 <br /> <br />FLOODS IN COLORADO <br /> <br />the afternoon and evening the banks of the Cherry Creek and South Platte River <br />were lined with men, women, and children who waited, enduring the blinding <br />storm of snow, standing ankle-deep in mud and slush, in anticira.tion of a flood <br />of p;rea.ter magnitude than that of 1864, both streams being but little below the <br />high-water mark of that flood. However, no great damage was done at that time. <br /> <br />J, E. Field, consulting engineer, who remembers the flood of 1876, <br />stateS that the flood stage was increased by the debris from bridges <br />that had failed lodging against the Larimer Street Bridge. Below <br />Larimer Street there was but little overflow. The Flood Commission's <br />statement that the high-water mark was but little below that of <br />1864 and that no great damage was done, appears to be explained <br />by the situation described by Mr, Field. <br />The flood of May 22, 1878, was evidently caused by heavy rains of <br />cloudburst intensity covering a limited part of the drainage basin. <br />No widespread storm occurred at that time, as records of prccipitation <br />available for six stations in Colorado show no precipitation as great <br />as half an inch in 24 hours except at Fort Lyon, in the Arkansas <br />Valley. The prccipitation at Denver was only 0.12 . inch. The <br />Cherry Creek Flood Commission" describes this flood as follows: <br /> <br />The fourth Cherry Creek flood recorded occurred on the morning of Wednes- <br />day, May 22, 1878. It was considered by many of the earlier residents of Denver <br />to be as large as the flood of 1864. We are not infonned as to exactly where or <br />how this one originated. The damage resulting therefrom was not nearly so <br />great as that from the flood of 1864. The reason for the decreased amount of <br />damage appeared, however, to be due, not so much to any lesser flaw of watert <br />but rather to the facts that there were no buildings in the bed of the stream at the <br />time of the 1878 flood: and, on the other hand, the channel of the creek was wider, <br />deeper, Bnd clearer than was the case at the time of the 1864 flood j and, further- <br />more, there a.ppears to ha.ve been no especial flood in the South Platte River at <br />this time, retarding tIle flow of Cherry Creek. <br /> <br />Albert B. Sanford, curator of the State Historical Society M use- <br />urn, in an article in the Colorado Magazine, Jnly 1937, states that all <br />bridges across the stream in Denver were swept away within a few <br />minutes after the first wave descended, and that two lives were lost <br />and grcat danmge done to property. <br />The flood of July 26, 1885, like that of May 22, 1878, was not <br />caused by a general storm, but by local rains over the drainage basin <br />of Cherry Creek, as tho available records showed no heavy precipita- <br />tion throughout Colorado <br />The Rocky Mountain News, July 27, 1885, mentions the floods of <br />1864 and 1878 as the two great floods prior to that of 1885. Describ- <br />ing the flood of 1885, it states: <br /> <br />Shortly after 6 o'clock last evening persons crossing the Larimer Street Bridge <br />saw a wave coming down Cherry Creek. * * *. At 6:30 the scene from <br /> <br />II Op. cJ.1;., p. 14. <br /> <br />r <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />MAJOR FLOODS-SOUTH PLATTE RIVER <br /> <br />63 <br /> <br />Larimer Street Bridge was perfectly indescribable White-capped waves surged <br />down in their mighty anger, threatening to engulC everything in their way, carry- <br />ing on their surface huge timbers and debris from ill-fated bridges and buildings. <br />'" * * At 1 :30 this morning * * * the waters of the creek had greatly <br />fallen and the flood seemed to be rapidly subsiding. * * * George Haffer <br />[an old-timer] said there was fully as much water as in the flood of 1864, but that <br />WesL Denver had been filled up and built up from 4 to 7 feet, so that the water OD <br />this occasion did not spread as much as the great flood oC 1864. <br />The iron bridges yesrorday stood the force of the flood perfectly. When built <br />it was supposed they would never be touched by the rising waters of a flood. but.- <br />yesterday the waves rolled over most of them and reached all. <br /> <br />The fact that the bridges were built after the experiences of 1864 <br />and 1878 would indicate, as the newspaper account infers, that this <br />flood was probably greater than any previojIs flood. <br />'fhe Cherry Creek Flood Commission" states: <br /> <br />Weare not informed as to just what part of the valley was covered by this <br />storm, or whether it was from a general storm covering the drainage Brea as a: <br />. whole. Considerable damage was done by this flood. West Denver was flooded <br />about as it was in the flood of July 14, 1912. Mr. C. P. Allen, engineer of the <br />Water Company, and Mr. E. S. Nettle:ton, State Engineer, estimated the dig-- <br />charge oC this flood at its maximum to be 20,000 second-feet, the estimate being <br />made a.t the Curtis Street Bridge by timing floats and measuring the existing <br />cha.mwl. All railroad bridges over Cherry Creek from Wynkoop Street to tJle <br />[South] Pla.tte were washed away. Trains from the south loaded and unloaded <br />their passengers at Sixth and Larimer Streets for several da.ys. , <br /> <br />'l'he flood of July 14, 1912, is the first ono on Cherry Creek for which <br />detailed information is available. Soon after it occurred, the Mayor <br />of Denver appointcd the Cherry Creek Flood Commission, which made <br />an investigation of flood conditions and proposed a plan for relief <br />from future floods. Much of thc information presented here is taken <br />from the Commission's report." 'fwo lives were lost, and property <br />both in Denvcr and in the valley above Denver was damaged to the <br />extent of more than $1,000,000. The city engineer prepared a map <br />showing the area floodcd in Denver. Along Cherry Croek from the <br />city limits to a point about a mile above its mouth the flooded area <br />covered a block and a half (900 feet) on the north bank and half s. <br />block on the south bank. Near thc mouth the flood spread over the <br />wide, fairly level bottom of the South Platte River, occupied chiefly <br />by railroad yards. In all, 86 blocks in the residential district and 19 <br />blocks in the business district worc inundated. Including the railroad <br />yards, a total of 1.7 square milcs was flooded. <br />The only Weather Bureau station in the Chorry Creek Basin at <br />that time was at Denver, and its records showed that although s. <br />violent rainstorm occurred, lasting 2 hours, during which 2.08 inch.". <br /> <br />loOp. clt., p.14. <br />II Report or Cherry Creek Flood Commission, Denver, 1913. <br />