Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />< <br />. <br /> <br />CODE I since the policy of no new development occurring at elevations below the 100- <br />year event is in effect. The table shows a large increase in expected annual damages. This <br />increase is because (1) damage does occur for new basement construction, (2) the 100- <br />year flood for 1990 land use conditions is higher than the 100-year flood for existing <br />land use conditions, and (3) damages are sustained by new development from events that <br />exceed the lOO-year event. Several other evaluations that include a number of alternative <br />control and flood proofing policies are included to demonstrate the broad capability of <br />the spatial data management technique as well as present some interesting evaluations of <br />policies designed to manage flood losses. The capabilities of the technique for evaluating <br />a range of nonstructural floodplain management measures is described by (Webb and <br />Burnham, 1976). <br /> <br /> TABLE 4. Selected Damage Assessments, Trail Crcek. <br /> (Expected Annual Damage in 1000's $) <br /> EV ALVA TlON CONDITION DAMAGE REACH <br /> Code land Use Policy. Hydrology 2 3 Total <br /> Existing (1974) 1.5 1.9 11.9 15.3 <br /> Existing <br />e X 1990 with no development controls 1990 1033.3 350.0 32.7 1416.0 <br />IV 1990 with new development at 1990 19.3 63.8 23.8 ]06.9 <br /> at 1975 I GO-year flood level <br /> V 1990 w/new devel. (IV 1975 100- 1990 ]6.8 18.9 4.7 40.4 <br /> yeu and flood proofed to ground <br /> floor <br /> VlIl 1990 w Jnew devel. @ ) 990 ) 00- 1990 ] 1.9 16.0 2.8 30.7 <br /> year and flood proofed to ground <br /> Ooor <br /> <br />*The ) 990 land use condition is a projection based on local agency judgment. In some instances. such <br />as Damage Reach No.3, 1990 urban type development has displaced some present agricultural de- <br />velopment. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />. <br />, <br /> <br />The objective of the environmental assessment is to provide a general description of the <br />environmental status of the watershed areas for alternative land use patterns. The ap- <br />proach taken was to confine the analysis to specific achievable and quantifiable assess- <br />ments and includes coincident tabulation, locational attractiveness analysis, urban storm <br />water water quality and land surface erosion analysis, and simulation of the dynamic <br />quality response of receiving water to urban storm water runoff and dry weather sani- <br />tary luading. The techniques draw heavily upon the grid cell data file for parameter <br />definition, and on spatial analysis techniques for some computations. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />13 <br />