Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />and developing similar data for categories without structures such as for the category <br />developed open space. The composite damage function for the agricultural category was <br />generalized to represent an agricultural enterprise in that the function considered a typical <br />mix of farm structures, crops, farm machinery, livestock, etc. <br /> <br />TABLE 3. HydIologic Data Summary, Trail Creek. <br /> <br />, <br />. <br /> <br />I DO-YEAR PEAK FLOW AND ELEV ATlON <br /> <br />Index <br />Station <br /> <br />Existing Land Use <br />Flow (cCs) Elevation <br /> <br />1990 Land Use <br />Flow (cCs) Elevation <br /> <br />I <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br /> <br />7600 627.1 9400 628.3 <br />3450 656.4 3800 656.7 <br />2600 711.9 2900 712.2 <br />3900 650.3 5]00 651.2 <br />1600 694.2 1650 694.3 <br /> <br /> FLOW-EXCEEDANCE INTERVAL DATA <br /> (cfs) <br /> Index Station <br />Exceedance I 2 3 4 5 <br />In_aI (yr) Exist 1900 Exist 1990 Exist 1990 Exist 1990 Exist 1990 <br />5 2000 2800 950 ]200 800 960 1100 1700 500 570 <br />10 3000 3900 1350 1650 1100 1300 1600 2300 700 780 <br />25 4400 5600 2000 2400 1600 1850 2300 3300 1000 1100 <br />50 5800 7300 2650 3000 2100 2350 3000 4000 1250 1350 <br />100 7600 9400 3400 3800 2700 3000 4000 5200 1600 1700 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The composite damage function data is prepared by land use category and the <br />DAMCAL program then accesses the grid data me and computes elevation-damage rela- <br />tions for the land use categories and damage reaches. The damage function aggregation <br />for future land use can be accomplished so that a1l designated new land use (change from <br />existing) will be placed no lower than a prescribed policy elevation, such as the existing <br />100-year flood level, and development control policy, such as flood proofing to the <br />ground floor will be accounted for. Alternative land use control policies can thus be <br />easily and quickly evaluated. <br />Table 4 summarizes selected expected arumal damage assessments for a range of condi- <br />tions and land use control policy sets for damage reaches within the Trail Creek watershed <br />that sustain significant damages. <br />The results are somewhat surprising and at first glance may be difficult to understand. <br />An initial reaction might be that evaluation condition CODE IV should be similar to <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-, <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />e <br />