Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Table 2 presents the basin parameters and the computed <br /> <br /> <br />peak flood flows. The parameters in Table 2 represented each <br /> <br /> <br />sub-basin or combination of sUb-basins, as indicated by the <br /> <br /> <br />notes. Where two peak flood flows are seemingly tabulated for <br /> <br /> <br />one basin, the first is the flow computed for the individual sub- <br /> <br /> <br />basin; the second is the peak flow in the channel determined by <br /> <br /> <br />an accumulation of the sub-basins contributing flow at the <br /> <br /> <br />specific hydrologic point location. <br /> <br /> <br />Information was acquired from the City of Thornton and <br /> <br /> <br />Adams County Planning Department concerning forecasted land use <br /> <br /> <br />within the basin at future dates. The information W?S presumed <br /> <br /> <br />to represent "fully developed" land use. Parameters mch as <br /> <br /> <br />infiltration rate, depression storage, detention sto 1ge, and <br /> <br /> <br />percentage of impervious ground cover were utilized ~0 determine <br /> <br /> <br />the amount of "effective rainfall" which would be discharged <br /> <br /> <br />from each sub-basin. Additional parameters of tributary area, <br /> <br /> <br />channel reach length, and distance to basin centroid were calcu- <br /> <br /> <br />lated and used to compute the runoff hydrographs which would <br /> <br /> <br />result from effective precipitation on each sub-basin. Para- <br /> <br /> <br />meters were determined for describing each basin area as they <br /> <br /> <br />accumulated along the channel. The CUHP program and appropriate <br /> <br /> <br />input data are all based on Snyder unit hydrograph theory. <br /> <br /> <br />Typical hydrographs are illustrated on Figures 1 through 5. <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 1 illustrates hydrographs computed along Brantner Gulch <br /> <br />TABLE 1 <br /> <br />BRANTNER GULCH ~~D REGIONAL PARK TRIBUTARIES <br />l20-MINUTE DESIGN STORM <br /> <br /> Rainfall Distribution in Accordance with I-Hour <br />Time NOAA Rainfall <br />(Hinutes) 2-year 5-year 10-year 50-year 100-year <br />5 0.019 0.027 0.032 0.030 0.027 <br />10 0.038 0.050 0.059 0.081 0.080 <br />15 0.080 0.117 0.131 0.116 0.122 <br />20 0.152 0.205 0.240 0.185 0.213 <br />25 0.238 0.335 0.400 0.347 0.372 <br />30 0.133 0.174 0.192 0.578 0.665 <br />35 0.060 0.078 0.090 0.277 0.372 <br />40 0.048 0.059 0.069 0.185 0.213 <br />45 0.029 0.048 0.061 0.116 0.165 <br />50 0.029 0.048 0.051 0.092 0.133 <br />55 0.029 0.040 0.051 0.069 0.106 <br />60 0.029 0.040 0.051 0.069 0.106 <br />65 0.029 0.040 0.051 0.069 0.106 <br />70 0.019 0.040 0.051 0.051 0.053 <br />75 0_019 0.029 0.051 0.051 0.053 <br />80 0.019 0.029 0.040 0.042 0.032 <br />85 0.019 0.029 0.030 0.042 0.032 <br />90 0.019 0.029 0.030 0.030 0.032 <br />95 0.019 0.029 0.030 0.030 0.032 <br />100 0.019 0.020 0.030 0.030 0.032 <br />105 0.019 0.020 0.030 0.030 0.032 <br />110 0.019 0.020 0.030 0.030 0.032 <br />115 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.030 0.032 <br />120 0.010 0.017 0.021 0.030 0.032 <br />Total <br />Rainfall 1.104 1. 543 1. 851 2.610 3.074 <br />