Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />v. HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />makes possible the development of a flood hydrograph based on <br /> <br /> <br />analysis of a predetermined rainfall and watershed character- <br /> <br /> <br />istics. Presented in this section is a summary of the steps <br /> <br /> <br />employed to develop flood flows in the study basins, using the <br /> <br /> <br />CUHP. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />General <br /> <br /> <br />The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District directed <br /> <br /> <br />that five specific flood flows were to be evaluated during the <br /> <br /> <br />development of the hydrology for Brantner Gulch and the Regional <br /> <br /> <br />Park Tributaries. These were the floods which could be expected <br /> <br /> <br />to occur, on the average, once every two, five, ten, fifty, and <br /> <br /> <br />one hundred years. These floods are referred to as the two- <br /> <br /> <br />year, five-year, ten-year, fifty-year, and one hundred-year <br /> <br /> <br />floods; they have likelihoods of occurring or being exceeded in <br /> <br /> <br />anyone year of 50%, 20%, 10%, 2%, and 1%, respectively. Whenever <br /> <br /> <br />possible in a hydrologic analysis, estimates of peak flow rates <br /> <br /> <br />would be determined through a statistical analysis of recorded <br /> <br /> <br />floods. However, no usable records exist of floods in the study <br /> <br /> <br />basins. Additionally, the flood flows which were to be evaluated <br /> <br /> <br />were those which would occur under the condition of <br /> <br /> <br />"full development" in the basin. For these reasons, a less <br /> <br /> <br />direct but more flexible method was employed to estimate the <br /> <br /> <br />flood flows. <br /> <br /> <br />The Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (Reference 1), <br />presents a method for predicting flood flows based upon a statis- <br />tical analysis of rainfall and runoff characteristics. The method <br />is known as the Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure (CUHP) and <br /> <br />The first step in the hydrologic analysis was to define <br /> <br /> <br />the routes which flood flows would follow in the basin. Limits <br /> <br /> <br />of Brantner Gulch watershed and its sub-basins were delineated <br /> <br /> <br />by locating the dividing ridges tributary to each channel. In <br /> <br /> <br />very flat areas such as the land adjacent to the South platte <br /> <br /> <br />River, defining the low-flow channel was more difficult and <br /> <br /> <br />required additional efforts. Key points, designated "points of <br /> <br /> <br />hydrologic computation," were selected along the Brantner Gulch <br /> <br /> <br />channel, its tributaries, and the Regional Park Tributary channels <br /> <br /> <br />as points at which calculations of flow rates could be made. <br /> <br /> <br />Figures 16 and 17 illustrate the main channel thalweg, the "points <br /> <br /> <br />of hydrologic computation," and the basin and sub-basin boundaries. <br /> <br /> <br />Rainfall data for storms of various return periods were <br /> <br /> <br />obtained from the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. <br /> <br /> <br />The District provided charts for the determination of C C <br />t' p <br /> <br />and rainfall distribution. Other parameter values were taken <br /> <br /> <br />from the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual. Synthetic rain- <br /> <br /> <br />storms of 120 minute lengths were developed for the two-year, <br /> <br /> <br />five-year, ten-year, fifty-year and one hundred-year events (see <br /> <br /> <br />Table 1). <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />