My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00689
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00689
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:21:34 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:25:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
136
County
Arapahoe
Community
Littleton
Stream Name
Slaughterhouse Gulch
Title
Major Drainageway Planning - Slaughterhouse Gulch, Littleton
Date
5/1/1974
Designation Date
5/1/1979
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I III <br />I <br />I <br />III <br />III <br />I <br />III <br />I <br />III <br />III <br /> <br />6. The recommendations provide an equitable means for <br />private property owners to cover potential flood losses <br />through federally subsidized flood insurance without <br />requiring the expenditure of obligation of any city funds. <br /> <br />7. The recommended improvements are totally compatible <br />with the existing and proposed development along the <br />drainageway. <br /> <br />8. The proposed improvements do not minimize options for <br />possible future improvements resulting from revised <br />land uses, but do establish control over the flood prone <br />area to guarantee correct and nonconflicting use. <br /> <br />9. The recommendations incorporate both management tools <br />and corrective measures to effectively control the <br />flooding problems of Slaughterhouse Gulch, ultimately <br />leading to the elimination of potential flood damages. <br /> <br />10. The proposed improvements are not so comprehensive so <br />as to raise conflicting legal questions. However, the <br />realignment of the conduit below Prince Street should <br />receive a legal review, as well as all other phases of <br />the proposed plan. <br /> <br />11. There is no increased liability attached to the City <br />resulting from ownership of additional or enlarged <br />storm water detention reservoirs. <br /> <br />In general, the recommended approach to flood control and <br />management on Slaughterhouse Gulch appears to be fair and <br />equitable to both the private and public sector. It provides <br />a plan which outlines the necessary structural improvements <br />required to control flooding from the 100 year storm event and <br />thus permit development of the adjacent areas presently within <br />the 100 year flood plain; it defines a flood plain limit through <br />an area which is presently undeveloped and is planned for develop- <br />ment as a city park: i.e. an area where improvements will be of <br />the type that generate little if any flood damage potential; it <br />defines the flooding problems associated with privately owned <br />land which has been developed unwisely and without concern for <br />flooding and proposes an equitable means of covering potential <br />flood damages; and also identifies areas which have seen addi- <br />tional hasty and unwise development without convern for pro- <br />viding the necessary drainage facilities. <br /> <br />Also, the recommended plan requires the minimum expenditure of <br />public funds for essentially upgrading the present public drainage <br />facilities and systems on the gulch. A means of recouping flood <br />losses is open to private property owners, in that they can be <br />qualified to acquire the necessary insurance protection for <br />potential flood damage to their property. Also, the plan defines <br />the area within which the City has the authority and responsibility <br />to establish the necessary control to regulate land use, with the <br />objective of minimizing potential flood losses to both the <br />private land owner and indirect losses to the City. Finally, the <br /> <br />VI-7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.