Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I III <br />I <br />I <br />III <br />III <br />I <br />III <br />I <br />III <br />III <br /> <br />6. The recommendations provide an equitable means for <br />private property owners to cover potential flood losses <br />through federally subsidized flood insurance without <br />requiring the expenditure of obligation of any city funds. <br /> <br />7. The recommended improvements are totally compatible <br />with the existing and proposed development along the <br />drainageway. <br /> <br />8. The proposed improvements do not minimize options for <br />possible future improvements resulting from revised <br />land uses, but do establish control over the flood prone <br />area to guarantee correct and nonconflicting use. <br /> <br />9. The recommendations incorporate both management tools <br />and corrective measures to effectively control the <br />flooding problems of Slaughterhouse Gulch, ultimately <br />leading to the elimination of potential flood damages. <br /> <br />10. The proposed improvements are not so comprehensive so <br />as to raise conflicting legal questions. However, the <br />realignment of the conduit below Prince Street should <br />receive a legal review, as well as all other phases of <br />the proposed plan. <br /> <br />11. There is no increased liability attached to the City <br />resulting from ownership of additional or enlarged <br />storm water detention reservoirs. <br /> <br />In general, the recommended approach to flood control and <br />management on Slaughterhouse Gulch appears to be fair and <br />equitable to both the private and public sector. It provides <br />a plan which outlines the necessary structural improvements <br />required to control flooding from the 100 year storm event and <br />thus permit development of the adjacent areas presently within <br />the 100 year flood plain; it defines a flood plain limit through <br />an area which is presently undeveloped and is planned for develop- <br />ment as a city park: i.e. an area where improvements will be of <br />the type that generate little if any flood damage potential; it <br />defines the flooding problems associated with privately owned <br />land which has been developed unwisely and without concern for <br />flooding and proposes an equitable means of covering potential <br />flood damages; and also identifies areas which have seen addi- <br />tional hasty and unwise development without convern for pro- <br />viding the necessary drainage facilities. <br /> <br />Also, the recommended plan requires the minimum expenditure of <br />public funds for essentially upgrading the present public drainage <br />facilities and systems on the gulch. A means of recouping flood <br />losses is open to private property owners, in that they can be <br />qualified to acquire the necessary insurance protection for <br />potential flood damage to their property. Also, the plan defines <br />the area within which the City has the authority and responsibility <br />to establish the necessary control to regulate land use, with the <br />objective of minimizing potential flood losses to both the <br />private land owner and indirect losses to the City. Finally, the <br /> <br />VI-7 <br />