Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 1. Summary of Discharges (Cont'd) <br /> <br />Flooding Source <br />and Location <br /> <br />Drainage Area <br />(Square Miles) <br /> <br />Peak Discharges <br />(Cubic Feet Per Second) <br />10-Year 50-Year 100-Year 500-Year <br /> <br />Cedar Run <br />At Upstream Study Limit, <br />Southwest Corner, <br />Section 6 2.47 90 138 179 280 <br />At Eckert Cemetery 3.14 110 163 220 325 <br />At Orchard City Post Office 3.43 113 175 222 345 <br />At Half Section Line of <br />Section 26 3.96 126 193 245 380 <br />At Downstream Study Limit 4.68 142 217 275 430 <br />3.2 Hydraulic Analyses <br /> <br />Analyses of the hydraulic characteristics of streams in the com- <br />munity were carried out to provide estimates of the elevations <br />of floods of the selected recurrence intervals along each stream <br />studied in the community. <br /> <br />For Surface Creek and Cedar Run, the water-surface elevations <br />of floods of the selected recurrence intervals were computed through <br />use of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-2 step-backwater computer <br />program (Reference 9). The results obtained from the HEC-2 computer <br />program were adjusted in the vicinity of bridges to more accurately <br />represent actual flooding conditions (Reference 10). <br /> <br />Cross sections for the backwater analyses of Surface Creek and <br />Cedar Run were obtained by aerial photogrammetry (Reference 11). <br />The below-water sections were obtained by field measurement. <br />All bridges, dams, and culverts were field surveyed to obtain <br />elevation data and structural geometry. On both streams, several <br />small private driveway bridges, which were not considered sturdy <br />enough to withstand peak floods, were assumed to be washed out <br />during any major flood. <br /> <br />Locations of selected cross sections used in the hydraulic analyses <br />are shown on the Flood Profiles (Exhibit 1). For stream segments <br />for which a floodway is computed (Section 4.2), selected cross <br />section locations are also shown on the Flood Boundary and Floodway <br />Map (Exhibit 2). <br /> <br />Roughness factors (Manning's "n") used in the hydraulic comput- <br />ations for the study streams were chosen by engineering judgment <br />and based on field observations of the flooding sources and flood <br />plain areas. Roughness values for the main channel of Surface <br />Creek and Cedar Run ranged from 0.017 to 0.040, and flood plain <br />roughness values ranged from 0.035 to 0.070. <br /> <br />7 <br />