Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I. <br />I/""' <br />\. <br />I" <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1-:.: <br />I <br /> <br />49. Page 35, Table 8. Disagree that the No ActioIl aJlematiYe will llave DO etfecl or <br />Deaative effecll on ~mstrial resolll'CC$ (ripIIiaD timber mI lUlderstory). If m speDd DO <br />Fedm1 timds on this site, it wiD .10 oatunl", ~i'll from c:roplaDd to uplaDd <br />YCICtAtion, with DODDIl NCCCSIioD pattenlS. l'heft will bt DalIInI developmem of riparian <br />foRlt, IS weD as 1IDderstory. It may DOt be 1be ideal desi.ed spec:ies CCi~lrioD. bul <br />terreStrial resources would benefit from this alterDalive. AIIo, for mJlmfM1t IUd ocher biIds <br />UDder Wildlife, tile effects of alternative D would be beDefic:ial. In .""ltV.a, Alternatives <br />C and D should both have a "+ "for tbe bald . ('mc:rease in perch/roost dteI). UDder <br />Prime Formlaod, Alternative D will also have a DeptM effect. 11Ie ef&ctl of Iltemative <br />D on recreatioD, air quality, noise, and a~ wwId be the same IS for aJ-tive C. <br />Don't understand why alternative C would have 1 positive e:fI'ect on wata" quaJily. but <br />alternative D would have no elfec:t; tbey sboWd lIave II1e same effect-none. Altemadves <br />C and D will both have a positive effect on aesthetic:s. <br /> <br />SO. Pap 36, Wiler Quality. State whether the Nebrasb Department of Environ........"'1 <br />Quality bas any COIIIIllCDts with respect to water quaIily effeccs of the project. Discuss the <br />status of c:ompliaDce with tbe t.1ean Water Ad. AJso discuss that Secdon 401 warer quality <br />c:ertific:ation will be RqUired. <br /> <br />51. Page 36, Air Quality. State whether any COtll.eaJlS with mspect to air quality have <br />arisen. Discuss SlIlUS of compliance with the Clean Air Aa.. <br /> <br />52. Pase 36, Prime Fannland. Disc:us$ coordinaIioD wi1h the Natmal Resources <br />Conservation Cnmmicsion or lIny Incal related offices with respec;t to inlJ*1S on prime <br />fumlJlod.. <br /> <br />53. Pase 37, Aquatic: ResoUJ'CC$. Discusses tbat 1be I'U~tt....d altemative wOl1lc1 resulIs In <br />backwaters. From the descriptions of the alternative in earlier sections. it doesn't appear <br />there will be any backwaters created. just a wide shallow c:Jmt.e. Wbk:h is ac:c:urate? <br /> <br />54. Page 38, para (4), The statement tIIaI floodillg woald hiDIer the escabli,,1l..- of <br />woddy vegerat10n Is lnarclUlm. In fact Ibc ~ is probably uue. <br /> <br />55. Pap 38. pan. h. StaleS that the BioloP:a1 Assenmrm is Appendix F. It is """",,11y <br />Appf-odi~ E. <br /> <br />56. Page 39,Aua:rk;lw !kuying ~t1e and Westma Prairlc FrlDpd Orchid. Slate wbctbcr <br />1 survey for these species will be done prior to ~...1ioD. <br /> <br />57. Pages 39 aIlIl40, Cultmal Resources. S.!be resu1ts of any c:oordinaIioDICODtact with <br />k Stale Historic Preservation Officer. <br /> <br />S8. Pase 42, para 11(1), The fisn senteDCe sbou1d lad "The Omaha District plans to <br />contract with tile Nebraska Game and pub Commi<.Mn to ""'''''IC the project for ...... <br /> <br />59. Pase 43, AD 1d'eIences to .meadow" should be dIaD&ed to "pll5l"laNl.. <br />