Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I: <br />10 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I . <br />, - <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />38. Page 30. TallIe 6. For "Tolll Acres ofWet1mII", I ralinl of "O"ts emn for Ibe "A" <br />Alttl1lltives, which would iDdi<:a~ that there would be 110 wedaDds after 1be deve10pmelll <br />of the project. However, on tile next page in the first parapph under AJtemathe A, It <br />stateS lIlal ".. .lmpaa is ufi'lICl. bylbe 48 &Q'CS of opcuwlllcr/wedaDds dW would be _red <br />. . . ." WiD any wetlands be creabld UDder Altcmati.,. A? If eo, 111>>10 6 needI 1eVisIoD. II <br />not, the writeups for the "A" AJtemativa need misioa. Table 8 will alIo Deed CO be <br />consisteDt. <br /> <br />39. Paee 30, Table 6. It scc::ms that anmlAI O&M coslI would be hisJ'-t 'for .A1temative <br />B because of Ibe amOUDt of dredging tha1 would be required for maiDteDaDce. <br /> <br />40. Page 30, Table 6. Disagree with the "t"rating pen to AItcmaIive C for "Probability <br />of Success". Some of the goals listed in Table 3 deal with restoratioJ1 of ka.estrlal habitat. <br />The raliDi ll\huuld be "5" or close to that. <br /> <br />41. Pale 30, Table 6. Change "Pish and W'llcllife ''T''"" to "Fub and Wildlife BeaefiIs". <br />Appencfut D, Evaluation Criteria Tables, states that aJIa:oativa are rated for tbcir beoefils <br />to fish and wildlife resources. If "impacts" to fish and wildlife resources wen beiDa <br />evaluated, the ratilli' would be clift'ereut. <br /> <br />42. Be sure any changes to Table 6 are also made ill the aw.opriate places ill AwMir <br />D. <br /> <br />43. PDge 32, 1st aDd 5th para. and page 33 31d pm., These sentences shouJd rtf't,tJlCe <br />wbeze die cletailed o&M cost estim"tn can be found. <br /> <br />44. Page 32, last paragraph. . first senteDc:e. Add to tbe begiImiDg of TIle first semea:e: "Of <br />the action alternatives". 'Ibis will be necessary sm the oext page, for AJ-tm D, it <br />states that this ".. . alternative would result in tbe least amonnr tlf di~ to the <br />Langdon Bend site." On page 33, second senlm:C, insert "action" betwecu "rJ1is" and <br />"alternative" . <br /> <br />4S. Page 32, last paragraph. The expected loDg term efl'ects OD ....,"'....c would be die same <br />lIS those descn'bed for Altemative D on pase 33. which mped to peIChiDJ of die site aM <br />succession to 'tpl"ncJ vegetation. <br /> <br />(46, Pages 33 and 34, Selected Plan. Add olpp.w.Auatc qwantitiH for excavation of die plloc <br />;It cbannel, rock for !be inletlODtlet SlrUCtUIa, and grade CODtIOI SUUCt1Ue. This iIIfoouation <br />is Deeded for the 404 public notice, <br /> <br />47. Page 34, last pua. Why was a IS-year project life lI$$I.......t? <br /> <br />48. Page 3S, Table 8. UDder Aquaticlwet1ands (wedandsIpoms), see commelt for Table <br />6, Total Aczes of Wed.nrI~. above. <br />