My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00391
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00391
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:21:52 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:15:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Fort Collins
Title
What Have We Learned Since the Big Thompson Flood July 31, 1976
Date
7/10/1996
Prepared For
Big Thompson Symposium
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Emergency Management Questionnaire Results Regarding Weather Hazards. <br /> <br />The NOAA Forecast Systems Laboratory (FSL) is conducting a questionnaire survey of Emer- <br />gency Management (EM) officials as part of the development phase of the Local Data Acquisition <br />and Dissemination (LDAD) project. The questionnaire assists FSL with understanding EM needs <br />regarding weather-related events. The questionnaire explores several aspects of weather informa- <br />tion within EM that can assist FSL with product development and training plans. The EM users <br />are queried about weather-related events that are most/least important to their operations, events <br />that are currently covered most/least effectively, their desires for weather-related information, and <br />the current level of meteorological training. As of 25 June 1996 there have been 52 respondents <br />(Fig. I). Tabulated results for three parts of the questionnaire are shown in Tables 1-3. The <br />results were done for all respondents taken together as well as subgroups based on four specified <br />weather hazards: tornadoes, hurricanes/tropical storms, blizzards/snowstorms, and fires. Some <br />respondents belong to more than one subgroup, and others do not fall into any subgroups. <br /> <br />Flooding is consistently a top priority in all climate regions of the U.S. Table I shows the average <br />rating of all respondents in the second column. Wind events, tornadoes, and the weather's impact <br />on chemical or nuclear dangers are all important across many areas. In localized areas, hurricane <br />or tornado threats rank as slightly more important to EM activity than flooding. Table 2 shows <br />that the National Weather Service is a primary source of information. Table 3 provides some indi- <br />cation on how well that information meets the needs in EM. EM officials are generally quite sat- <br />isfied with their current weather guidance on hurricanes, moderately satisfied with heavy <br />precipitation/flood guidance, and rather dissatisfied with tornado and severe thunderstorm guid- <br />ance (hail and lightning). This feedback is an important step for developing more effective <br />weather support to EM agencies as the National Weather Service proceeds with its modernization. <br /> <br />Matthew Kelsch" <br />NOANFSL R/ElFSI <br />325 Broadway <br />Boulder, CO 80303 <br />kelsch@fsl.noaagov <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />"J <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Cl ......." <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Figure I: Distribution of 52 questionnaire respondents as of June 1996. <br /> <br />"jointly affiliated with the Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Col- <br />lins, CO. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.