Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1- 20 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />< <br /> <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />-~ <br /> <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />j <br />I <br />j <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />The hydrology can be used in the alternative evaluation process. Alternatives <br />developed might consider options to "firm up" existing flood storage in the <br />mountains, which may in turn lower flows to the significant, potentially <br />impacted floodplain in the West Valley. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Stream flow routing model improvements should be pursued in the main <br />stream below Gross and especially in the floodplains downstream of Eldorado <br />Canyon, particularly if new floodplain mapping is to be pursued. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />This new hydrology model should be considered as an interim result and <br />subject to further change. Subsequent surveys, analysis, floodplain mapping, <br />and design of improvements may reveal the need for refinements to reflect <br />important splits, floodplain characteristics and dynamic storage, and other <br />factors. <br />