Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The firm of Simons, Li and Associates performed a hydrologic study for a "Garfield County <br />Unincorporated Areas Flood Insurance Study" (January 3,1986). This study was for a number of <br />streams in the County including the lower Roaring Fork River. It also separated streamflow data <br />into snowmelt and rainfall events. Some of those peaks were determined using USGS strip charts. <br />Those rainfall and snowmelt events were analyzed separately and composite curves were developed. <br />These studies included some drainage areas larger than the areas in this study. <br /> <br />The COE studies indicated above were summarized in the "Pitkin County Colorado, and <br />Incorporated Areas Flood Insurance Study" (June 4. 1987), Data from a large number of gaging <br />stations were analyzed, The gages were located in Pitkin, Summit, Eagle, Garfield, Mesa, Delta, and <br />Gunnison Counties. The streamflow data were separated into snowmelt and rainfall peaks and <br />analyzed separately. <br /> <br />Snowmelt peaks from a total of 40 gages and rainfall from 25 gages were analyzed to obtain <br />individual and regional statistical parameters of mean, standard deviation, and skew for the two types <br />of peaks. They found that in numerous instances, the rainfall peaks were of very small magnitude <br />and several streams did not show any significant peaks caused by rainfall. The two types of <br />distributions were combined to obtain the overall peak discharge-frequency relationship for each <br />stream, For ungaged streams, the values of regional statistical parameters were used and discharge, <br />drainage area curves were developed for specific frequencies. Those studies were mostly for smaller <br />drainage areas then the ones in this current study. <br /> <br /> <br />A summary of the results of pertinent previous flood frequency studies that have been made for the <br />Roaring Fork River are presented in Table 1. <br /> <br />Eagle River <br /> <br />The previous flood study of the Eagle River most pertinent to the reach included in this LMMP Task <br />Order is the FIS for the Town of Gypsum dated March 16,1986. Peak discharge series recorded at <br />the gage below Gypsum (09070000) was used in this study to determine peak flows for different <br />frequencies. The FIS for Eagle County, unincorporated areas, May 1980 includes other peak <br />discharge frequency data for the Eagle River as shown on Table 2, <br /> <br />III. NEW HYDROLOGIC STUDIES FOR THIS "LMMP" TASK ORDER <br /> <br />General <br /> <br />I.F. Sato and Associates performed flood frequency analyses for the Roaring Fork River gages at <br />Aspen and at Glenwood Springs and for the Eagle River gage downstream from Gypsum. These <br />analysis were made using the computer program, FFFREAK. Version 1, that was developed by US <br />West. The program was designed to run using peak discharge values contained in their CD <br />HYDRODAT A product. The program follows procedures recommended in Bulletin 17B except for <br /> <br />3 <br />