My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00328
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00328
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:42:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:13:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Eagle
Community
Eagle
Stream Name
Eagle River
Title
Hydrology Report Roaring Fork and Eagle Rivers
Date
12/1/1997
Prepared For
Eagle County
Prepared By
J.F. Sato & Associates
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Per FEMA's designation of a Iimited,detaiI study only the 100-year flood profile and the IOO-year <br />floodplain boundaries need to be analyzed. The Town of Gypsum at the downstream end of the <br />study reach and the Town of Eagle at the upstream end are incorporated areas which were not <br />included in this Task Order. However, the limited detail study of this reach will include the 100-year <br />water surface profile through both towns, A USGS stream gaging station is located just below the <br />Town of Gypsum. <br /> <br />Background Information <br /> <br />The current floor hazard information for communities along the Roaring Fork and Eagle Rivers is <br />based on hydrologic studies completed 15 to 20 years ago. Therefore, it was decided in the T&C <br />meeting to review previous hydrologic studies, conduct frequency analyses using the additional <br />hydrologic data now available, and revise the peak discharges in the specific study reaches, if <br />deemed necessary. The adopted peak discharges will be used to perform the hydraulic analyses of <br />both stream reaches. New aerial mapping and cross section data provided by the Communities will <br />be used in the hydraulic analyses to reflect physical changes that have occurred in the study areas <br />as a result of new construction. <br /> <br />This hydrologic study involves review of previous studies and a new statistical evaluation of peak <br />flow data for the two USGS gaging stations on the main stem Roaring Fork River (Aspen and <br />GIenwood Springs) and one station on the Eagle River below Gypsum. These stream gages are the <br />ones that are most pertinent to the reaches covered under this study. The study includes a <br />recommendation about whether current flood frequency studies are adequate and what discharge <br />values should be used in the hydraulic studies for the specific reaches included in this Task Order. <br /> <br />II. PREVIOUS HYDROLOGIC STUDIES <br /> <br />Roaring Fork River <br /> <br />The Sacramento District ofthe U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) performed a study that was <br />documented in "Internal Memorandum, Basalt, Colorado, Hydrology", August 1976. The COE <br />study has been widely used in the Roaring Fork Basin and was used in the "Floodplain Information <br />Report, Roaring Fork and Fryingpan Rivers, Eagle County, Colorado" prepared by Wright- <br />McLaughlin Engineers in February 1978. These same peak discharges were used by the <br />Department of Transportation for design of Colorado State Highway 82 bridges near Basalt. <br /> <br />The "Eagle County Unincorporated Areas Flood Insurance Study" (January 1979) indicates that <br />Gingery and Associates performed hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for that report. The <br />streamflow data were again separated into snowmelt and rainfall events. A total of IS stream gages <br />located in Eagle County were analyzed. The length of streamflow records varied from 6 to 43 years. <br />They found that snowmelt peaks dominated for larger basins and cloudbursts produce the peaks in <br />smaller basins, generally under 20 square miles. They used results form COE studies for reaches <br />near Basalt. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.