My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD00310
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FLOOD00310
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:21:56 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 9:12:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Arapahoe
Stream Name
South Platte
Title
Union Avenue Boat Drop
Date
1/1/1983
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />stream flow. These responses to stream flow by different user groups <br />are the criteria which are basic to the methods introduced here. <br /> <br />The first method is called the single cross section approach. This <br />method is useful primarily for identifying flows below which a recrea- <br />tion activity is not feasible and results in a so called "minimum" flow <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />:.; .::~;i.:;:': <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />The second method is called the incremental method. With thi s <br />method the recreation planner is able to analyze vari ous fl ows and <br />determine the recreation potential of a stream at different flows. <br /> <br />This paper is being distributed with four objectives in mind. <br />These are: <br /> <br />-. <br /> <br />1. To bring the problem of preserving instream flows to the <br />attent i on of recreat i onagenci es and the research community in <br />order to encourage more research in this vital and neglected <br />area. <br /> <br />2. To discuss the development of the recreation probability-of- <br />use curves and of recreation cri teri a in general, whi ch are <br />necessary for quantifying instream water requirements for <br />recreation. <br /> <br />3. To obtain review and comment on the recreation criteria and <br />probability-of-use curves, and to request data which may be <br />used to test or improve the criteria or curves. <br /> <br />4. To describe the two approaches for assessing stream flows and <br />discuss how various recreation planning processes can be <br />served by their application. <br /> <br />Both methods of instream flow analysis discussed in this paper <br />utilize computer modeling techniques. Both approaches also require that <br />streamflow data be collected. The single cross section approach, as its <br />name implies, requires that information be collected at only one loca- <br />tion on the stream. The incremental method requires that data be co1- <br />, 1ected at multiple locations on the stream. In addition to cross <br />sectional data, data relating the streamflow parameters to recreation <br />potential are necessary. These data are termed recreation criteria. <br /> <br />Recreation criteria for instream flow methodologies are the rec- <br />reation activity information bases necessary to describe a relationship <br />between the quantity of water flowing in a stream, and the quantity and <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.