Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />COMMON DESIGN ELEMENTS <br /> <br />Douglas Reservoir - Soillwav Enhancement Regulating Weir <br /> <br />Douglas Reservoir is located on Dry Creek between the Upper and Middle Basin. As such, <br />any floodwaters generated in the Upper Basin must pass through the reservoir. Douglas <br />Reservoir was designed for storage of irrigation water and does not supply explicit storage <br />for flood control. The existing structure attenuates flood flows to some degree; however, <br />additional storage in the reservoir could further attenuate peak flood flows and decrease <br />flood discharge downstream. Because of the location of Douglas Reservoir within the <br />watershed, the large volume of water storage, and because it is an existing structure ranked <br />it as a prirne candidate for flood storage in the Middle Basin. Because it is an existing <br />structure, it requires rninimal additional construction to achieve additional storage. Thus, <br />the estimated construction cost ( per unit of storage) is much lower than for a new facility <br />and would result in rninirnal incremental environmental impacts with providing additional <br />flood storage. <br /> <br />A zoned earthfill Regulating Weir at the Douglas Reservoir spillway would allow for <br />additional storage of floodwaters in the reservoir during extreme runoff events without <br />compromising the safety of the dam. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />An earthfill Regulating Weir structure is typically an earth or mechanical structure, which <br />provides additional storage to the crest of an emergency spillway but is designed to allow <br />overtopping flow in a controlled manner, in case of extreme flows. The current emergency <br />spillway of Douglas Reservoir has been designed to pass 75 percent of the Probable <br />Maximum Flood (PMF) or 39,750-cfs. As such, in order to ~epuate flows up to the 100- <br />year frequency event, a Regulating Weir approximately 3-~igh would be required. <br />This height is based on a hydrologic model incorporating the routing of the upstream <br />hydrograph through reservoir and spillway. <br /> <br />The preliminary conceptual design is shown on Figure 7. In general, the design consists of <br />dividing the weir into three (3) sections by constructing two (2) cast-in-place concrete <br />piers. These piers will be designed to be stable under the design flood and to minimize <br />hydraulic impacts on the ultimate capacity of the spillway. The first section will remain at <br />the existing grade of the spillway crest and will therefore not affect the normal operating <br />water surface elevation within the reservoir. All flood flows occurring upstream of the <br />reservoir up to and including the 100-year frequency inflow design flood will pass directly <br />through this opening. The second and third sections will have earthen structures <br />constructed to different heights above the existing spillway crest. The second section will <br />be constructed to a maximum height of 3-1/2 feet above the existing spillway crest. An <br />approximately lO-foot wide notch is provided in the weir section so that controlled erosion <br />will begin for water depths greater than 3 feet. A similar Regulating Weir will be <br />constructed in the third section to a height of 4 feet. This staggered effect will minimize <br />the magnitude of the release rate of the reservoir should one of the earthen structures be <br />overtopped. Access will be accommodated along the upstream slope of the dam structure. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The cost for the Regulating Weir was determined to be approximately $300,000. Initially <br />the Larimer and Weld Irrigation Company has indicated that they would be willing to <br />consider this structure if Dry Creek was upgraded to convey a minimum of 75-cfs. This <br />17 <br />