Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />The laO-year flood plain averages 100 feet in width, the channel velocities <br /> <br /> <br />average 5 feet per second, and overbank velocities average 2 feet per second. <br /> <br />profile is also shown where it can be distinguished on the profile drawings. <br /> <br /> <br />Future basin development and existing channel conditions were used to define <br /> <br /> <br />the elements of the flood hazard area. This report is intended for use by <br /> <br /> <br />local officials and other interested parties in planning the use and regula- <br /> <br /> <br />tion of the flood hazard areas. <br /> <br />The second reach extends from Section 33-34 line to the upstream limits. In- <br /> <br /> <br />cluded in this reach are the existing and projected filings of the Ken Caryl <br /> <br /> <br />Ranch Plains subdivision. At the upper end the drainageway has been replaced <br /> <br />by Continental Divide Road. The roadway will be overtopped without failure <br /> <br /> <br />during major flows. No other drainage problems are known to exist. The 100- <br /> <br /> <br />year flood plain averages 80 feet in width, the channel velocities average 2 <br /> <br /> <br />feet per second, and overbank velocities average 3 feet per second. <br /> <br />Floodway <br /> <br />The floodway of each drainageway was defined using Jefferson County's defini- <br /> <br /> <br />tion for "high hazard area". The criteria is lOa-year flood depth greater than <br /> <br /> <br />or equal to 1.0 foot and/or lOa-year flood velocity greater than or equal to <br /> <br /> <br />3.0 feet per second. Arapahoe County had no specific criteria for floodway and <br /> <br /> <br />agreed to go along with the Jefferson County criteria for continuity. <br /> <br />The contract suggested the floodway criteria of encroachment to produce a 0.5 <br /> <br /> <br />foot rise in lOa-year flood profile. For a typical stretch of Massey Draw, the <br /> <br />floodway was defined using both criteria. The Jefferson County criteria proved <br /> <br /> <br />more restrictive so it was used. In addition, no encroachment was permitted <br /> <br />into the defined channel, and engineering judgment was used to smooth the limits <br /> <br /> <br />in the final definition. <br /> <br />The lOa-year floodway was not defined wherever the lOa-year flood hazard area is <br />confined within a well defined channel. Floodway information is keyed to cross <br />section reference points and summarized on Tabl€$ IV-l through IV-5. In the <br />overland flow areas immediately downstream of roadway crossings and other controls <br />which are overtopped, a warning note is also given. It explains that encroachment into <br />the flood hazard area, and fill elevations should also consider the overland <br />flow created by the upstream control. <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br /> <br />The lOa-year flood plain and flood profile and the lOa-year floodway have been <br /> <br /> <br />defined for the study area and are documented in this report. The 10 year flood <br /> <br />~ Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers, Inc. <br />