Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4. ENHANCE EDUCATION, TRAINING, AND PUBLIC AWARENESS <br /> <br />The sustainable use of the nation's floodplains can only be achieved at the hands of an educated cadre <br />of professionals from various fields, The principles of sustainability themselves will need to be <br />brought into sharper focus as they apply to floodplain management, and as they pertain to the public <br />at large, <br /> <br />. Encouragement and support should be given by federal agencies and states to professional <br />certification programs for floodplain managers, adjusters, agents, and others. <br /> <br />. Better ways need to be found to convey to the public the uncertainties associated with weather <br />and flood forecasts, and to help people understand their risk and take appropriate action to <br />prepare for and avoid such hazards, <br /> <br />. Specific information about, and techniques for, sustainable floodplain management need to be <br />catalogued, docwnented, and built into the appropriate curricula of universities, elementary and <br />secondary schools, training facilities, and programs for the continuing education of professionals, <br /> <br />. We must find clearer ways to communicate flood risk so that it is meaningful to citizens and <br />communities, thus enabling them to take appropriate steps to reduce risk and damage, The <br />confusing terminology "I DO-year floodplain" should be abandoned in favor oflanguage that is <br />more understandable to the layperson, The ASFPM suggests using "1% chance flood," As an <br />alternative, the broader terms "high-risk flood" could be used for the 1 DO-year flood and <br />"moderate-risk flood" when referring to the SOD-year event, <br /> <br />5. ASSESS AND EVALUATE PROGRAMS <br /> <br />The most pressing deficiency in our nation's flood loss approach is the failure to stop periodically and <br />conduct a rigorous questioning of the value of what has been done already and what its effects have <br />been, There needs to be an independently conducted, comprehensive assessment of the effects of <br />policies and programs in force-particularly the National Flood Insurance Program-on both quantity <br />and quality of floodplain occupance throughout the United States. Are our efforts reducing overall <br />vulnerability to floods? To shape a more productive future, we need to have in hand a full and true <br />understanding of the effectiveness of the loss reduction programs and activities undertaken to date, <br />To move too far without such knowledge and understanding could well exacerbate rather than <br />improve our situation. <br /> <br />. The National Flood Insurance Program must be thorougWy evaluated, An assessment of its effects <br />on resource use, economics, and occupance of the floodplain should be done before reforms are <br />undertaken. <br /> <br />. The Principles and Guidelines and the National Economic Development standard need to be <br />reviewed and refined, to make them consistent with the elements of sustainability. <br /> <br />. The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program and the Flood Mitigation Assistance Program should be <br />evaluated, to determine whether the measures they fund are reducing losses and protecting <br />floodplain resources when both the entire watershed, and the long term, are considered, <br /> <br />Association of State Floodplain Managers <br /> <br />-vii- <br /> <br />National Flood Programs in Review 2000 <br />