Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~/~ <br /> <br />In brief, the findings are these. Of the 15,150 . <br />acres planned to be irrigated by the project extension on the <br />basis of surveys made in the early 1940's, about 8,730 acres <br />in small scattered tracts are either now irrigated or can be I <br />irrigated by a continuation of the expansion program of the <br />local irrigation companies. Of the remaining 6,420 acres, <br />more than half have been found, through detailed land classi- <br />fication surveys, to have severe soil and drainage deficiencies. . <br />The cost of providing irrigation service to about 3,100 acres <br />not eliminated for one of the foregoing reasons was found to <br />be greater than the benefits, and the lands were found incap- <br />able of paying operation and maintenance costs of project <br />works. <br /> <br />We are confident that you will agree with our conclu- <br />sion on the basis of information you secured in the field and <br />that which will be given in our report. We regret that the <br />findings are not more favorable with respect to the Pine River <br />Project Extension. <br /> <br />Very truly yours <br /> <br />/s/ E. O. LARSON <br />Regional Director <br /> <br />The statement made about my having <br />attended meetings is in error. It was <br />not I but Mr. Boydston from our office. <br />It looks as though the 1942 land classifica- <br />tion report had not been as complete as it <br />should be and the Bureau has established <br />new land classification criteria which <br />show that considerable land which they <br />originally intended to irrigate will not <br />meet the standards." <br /> <br />After a short discussion, it was decided no action <br />was needed on this communication at this time; <br /> <br />MR. GILDERSLEEVE: "The final item which I have is another <br />letter from Mr. Larson under date of May <br />29, 1958, as follows: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br />